ITT these but actually hard.

Just learn linear algebra

>8539727

solved:

4 apples (tomatoes?)
2 stacks of grapes
4 bernans
3 numbers that sum to 13
1 Question mark
4 Plus signs
4 Equals signs

But really though, these suck because they are open to interpretation. #notmymathematics

/r/ing the one with integrals and shit.

>>8539727
5 + 7 = 12 (which makes sense since there are 12 grapes)
7 - 1 = 6 = 3 bananas
7 + 11 grapes + 2 [from 1 banana] = 20

File: bye.jpg (48KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 800x600px

>didn't see there were three bananas

>>8539727
>Apple=7
>Grape=12
>Banana Bunch=6

Since there is only a third of Bananas in the last equation we find that:

>Banana=2

Making the last equation:

7+12+2=21

2ez

File: trolls.jpg (17KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 500x500px

>>8539727

>>8539727
Tomato=7
12G=tomato+5=12,
12=12G
G=1
7=1+3B
6=3B
2=B
T+11G+1B=?
7+11+2=20
The answer is 20 faggot

>>8539727
Stop mAkinG thEse threads, you autistic faggot

>>8540112
This is literally my first post on /sci/ ever.

>>8540009
one of the grapes is missing in the last picture

you disgusting brainlet

>>8540034
Come on, this is a simple algebra problem

>>8539962
Why did this make me laugh

File: This+looks+easy_a20f67_4937945.jpg (78KB, 680x696px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 680x696px

>>8539727

>>8540333
And nobody would be upset if it was your last. Cut your losses.

>>8539727
>these but actually hard.

The one you posted is impossible you fucking halfwitted coon.

>>8540459
kek

>>8540399
c because fuck you.

>>8540399
As long as you ignore the self-referencing bullshit it's D.

>>8540399
its c, really not that hard desu senpai

>>8540591
>the problem is self-referential
>ignore the self-referential bulshit
>ignore the problem
ok

File: 1452577054940.jpg (64KB, 540x540px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 540x540px

>>8540591
>As long as you ignore the problem it's D

File: IMG_1226.gif (3MB, 600x326px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 600x326px

v=7
w=5+v
v=1+x
v+w+x=z

v w x y z | constants

Simplified as an augmented matrix
With a 4x5 coefficient matrix

1 0 0 0 0 | 7
-1 1 0 0 0 | 5
1 0 1 0 0 | 1
1 1 1 1 -1 | 0
This system of equations is a non square system. No unique solutions available.

Although you could find a set of solutions if possible

>>8540544
>>8540626
Are you fucking serious? You think one of the possibilities is the solution, but you still say it's impossible to pick a solution?

>>8539727
First you need to define arithmetic on the set of fruits.

File: image.jpg (56KB, 610x608px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 610x608px

Well? I got stuck at the trig integrals.

>>8540399
der is no fagin anzer. There is a question being referred to, but it doesn't seem to be given. If the question is "what is the chance you will be correct" then the person who made this meme is either a troll or a retard.

Banana bunch and single banana are two different symbols, same with grapes. Therefore solution can be anything

imposeble

>>8539727
applemato = 7
grapes = 5 + applemato = 2
applemato = 1 + banana cubed
banana = cube root 6

applemato + grapes + banana = 9 + cube root banana

9 + cube root banana

>>8540112
>doesn't know if he's autistic
>doesn't know if he's a faggot
projecting much?

someone help me win a facebook argument

why does 6 / 2(1+2) = 1, and not 9? It's because in advanced math theoretics you want to do 2(3) first right? It's supposed to be either

>>8543690

6 / 2(1+2)

>1. interpret as (6/2)(1+2)
> (3)(3) = 9
>2. interpret as 6/(2(1+2))
>6/(2(3)) = 6/6 = 1

>>8540879
>v+w+x=z
> 1 1 1 1 -1 | 0
look again, fucktruck

i bet your mom thinks you're "good with numbers"

>>8542304
are you in like calc 1? This shit is elementary

>>8543690
>It's supposed to be either
According t the nuns at Sacred Heart, it's neither.
The expression is ambiguous because PEDMAS doesn't really use left to right as a tiebreaker, nor does "/" vs "÷" make a difference.

>>8539727
21

>>8542304
bottle=10
burger=5
pint=1
let x represent hotdog
(idk how to use Latex pls forgive)

integral (S) from 0 to inf of [ 10sin(x)/2x dx ]

=5 * S (0 - inf) [sin(x)/x dx]
=5*(si(x) |(inf, 0)
=5*(pi/2)

correct me if i`m wrong

>>8543800
lol are you retarded its 25

>>8543700

6 / 2(1 + 2)

>6 / 2(3)
>3 * 3
>9
FTFY

>>8540626
If you pick C and assume you're correct, then the probability is no longer 0%.

>>8543700
The second way isn't an interpretation it is just blatantly wrong.