How can we heal the ozone layer? Or is the hole going to keep

>>8531637
It already is healing. So long as we avoid fucking it up again, it should slowly come right.

File: CFC_HCFC_trends.png (43KB, 538x406px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 538x406px

>it should slowly come right.
But very, very slowly. CFCs are class I ozone depleting substances, HCFC is class II, less effective.

>>8531637
We already did something about it.

File: real_part.png (20KB, 376x238px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 376x238px

>>8532024
Data recorded from 1850 to 1970, before any significant CFC emissions, show that CO2 levels increased significantly as a result of the Industrial Revolution, but the global temperature, excluding the solar effect, kept nearly constant. The conventional warming model of CO2, suggests the temperatures should have risen by 0.6°C over the same period, similar to the period of 1970-2002.

The climate in the Antarctic stratosphere has been completely controlled by CFCs and cosmic rays, with no CO2 impact. The change in global surface temperature after the removal of the solar effect has shown zero correlation with CO2 but a nearly perfect linear correlation with CFCs - a correlation coefficient as high as 0.97.

The peer-reviewed paper published this week not only provides new fundamental understanding of the ozone hole and global climate change but has superior predictive capabilities, compared with the conventional sunlight-driven ozone-depleting and CO2-warming models.

phys.org/news/2013-05-global-chlorofluorocarbons-carbon-dioxide.html

>ozone hole is a thing that even hoaxers accept happened
>HUMAN ACTIVITY HAS _NO_ EFFECT ON REAL LIFE

>>8533510

>correlation

lol

I don't get it

Greenhouse gases cause the greenhouse effect

People figured this out in the 1800s. It happens on other planets too. Are they saying that CFCs are to blame for Venus' surface temperature?