Couldn't dark matter just be cold neutrinos?

>>8527862
With that mass? Also how the hell do you define temperature for a single particle?

>>8527866
by its kinetic energy and/or momentum?

>>8527873
I didnt mean that there is no way to do it, I was genuinely asking, is there a known way to achieve this?
Also, I think neutrinos have too low mass to explain dark matter and why would they have to be cold?

How sure you are it are particles... They may explain themselves at some moments...

>>8527891
Because dark matter isnt detected by neutrino detectors, so if they were the same particle dark matter would have to be at a much lower energy. Also known as temperatures at the particle scale.

>>8527891
Cold i.e. not moving much having mass, so they just gravity all the way?

>>8527862

dark
>i prefer to call it dank matter