Hey /sci/, convince me how I can adopt children without feeling

>>8518617
There are two parts of you that you care about preserving: genes and intellect. Of course animals care about preserving genes. But for humans we also care about passing along our worldview, value system etc. Adopting allows you to preserve this (arguably more important) part of yourself. Imagine two options: you can have a random person have your genes, or have them approach life in a similar way to you. I'd definitely pick the latter.

>>8518617

if you're considering adopting you're of inferior quality to begin with

so if you adopt someone else's kids you are actually cucking them by taking their genetic progeny and infusing them with your shit-tier way of life (which was already shit to begin with, so taking care of their children doesn't make you a cuck)

Well, for those who aren't able to conceive naturally, whether due to being gay, transexual, infertile or just too old, adoption is the best way to raise children and have a family while helping change a life, there's nothing cuckworthy about it.

But yeah, if you and your partner both have functioning opposite-sex genitalia, you might as well just get a chastity belt and hold a breeding session and invite every negro that you see.

>>8518634
Back to >>>/pol/

>>8518633
KEK DETECTED!