Get WOKE on OIL

>>8507947
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenic_petroleum_origin
?The weight of evidence currently shows that petroleum is derived from ancient biomass.[16] However, it still has to be established conclusively, which means that abiogenic alternative theories of petroleum formation cannot be dismissed.[17]

>A 2006 review article by Glasby presented arguments against the abiogenic origin of petroleum[clarification needed] on a number of counts.[1]

So basically all evidence so far suggests you're wrong but as long as there is a chance you're more willing to believe it's all part of a conspiracy against you than that you're wrong.

Sure, go ahead. Believe retarded shit. I'm not going to stop you. If anything it increases my ego knowing there are retards like you out there.

>>8507960

the wiki article is posted ironically, just to show that this is a 'debated topic' , but don't take wiki seriously since shills edit it to promote the shitlib spectrum of thought on all topics.

>>8507947
WAIT A SEC, WHERE DOES THE ENERGY FOR THIS COME FROM?

>>8507947
This is getting downright pathetic.
Just stop.

>>8507947
isn't it the the gasses from back when the earth was forming condensed into liquid over time? i have no idea.

not possible because methane and carbon dioxide has a low density and would have risen to the surface quickly after Earth's formation