What does /sci/ think of cryonics?

>>8507661
Currently its an expensive way to kill yourself as we don't know how to properly keep organisms as complex as us alive for long that way

>>8507672

It's not legal to freeze someone who's alive anyway.

>>8507661
It keeps dead people from decaying for a long time

It can stop decay but can it theoretically preserve the memories and stuff since those are electrical signals so it seems unlikely?

>>8507728
Memories are preserved in the physical structure of the brain

Freezing a brain destroys its cells, nothing is preserved

>>8507661
right now it doesn't work because it destroys the cells. In the future it could be a viable solution to preserve people until the technology needed to save their life is created.

I remember correctly there is a frog that freezes itself to hibernate and it uses glucose to prevent the freezing from killing it.

>>8507661
get your fucking terms right, do you wanna discuss cryonics, cryogenics, cryolically catalyzed concious reversal, cryiolity or cryostenity?

>>8507661
it's pretty cool

>>8507661
We may cryonically store a human easily alive.
We may yet cryonically store a human with full functionally, due to difficulties.

there are frogs that fill their cells with glucose and then freeze solid during the winter. the glucose prevents ice crystals from forming and destroying the cells.

>>8507661
Wow cryoneer (from BoomBeach) comes from the word 'cryonics'...
Brainfuck LOL