Evolution: Modern or Extended?

>>8505286
Whats difference?

and it'd better not be some bullshit

>>8505286
God did it, now duck off.

File: fintree.jpg (108KB, 444x480px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 444x480px

>>8505335
Midern synthesis relies primarily on natural selection as the explanation for current biodiversity, while the extended synthesis considers natural selection to be a major factor, alongside "multilevel selection theory, transgenerational epigenetic inheritance, niche construction and evolvability."

Think what Gould proposed.

>>8505337
Quack nigga

>>8505359
evolvability?

The extended one sounds like it has more explanatory power. You wiould have to give me reasons to not like it (Given that i dont know too muhc.)

File: evolution-of-tetrapods.jpg (93KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 800x600px

>>8505416
>evolvability?
As defined by Wikipedia:
Evolvability is defined as the capacity of a system for adaptive evolution. Evolvability is the ability of a population of organisms to not merely generate genetic diversity, but to generate adaptive genetic diversity, and thereby evolve through natural selection.

>>8505359
What's the point of difference between the two? Aren't all of those mechanisms are just natural selection working simultaneously on multiple generations and species?

File: 2_Darwins.jpg (266KB, 1269x786px) Image search: [Google]

266KB, 1269x786px

>>8505458
Probably. Bear in mind, the extended synthesis is meant to be an improvement of the darwinian theory, not a rehash.