Can you solve this for me?

I don't even know what I'm looking at.

>>8501819
If it was minesweeper I could

>>8501819
I wrote a kuakuro solver but you need to format input grid as text like that http://pastebin.com/YWc2xWwi

Is it one of those sudokus where you only know the sum of the numbers in each row and column?

>>8502779
The numbers are the sum total of the different rows and columns.

No zero's. Each sum is made with unique integers.

>top left "3" is either 1 + 2 or 2 + 1

>>8502800
>No zero's. Each sum is made with unique integers.
Each sum is made from the digits 1-9. That's the key.

Look at the right-hand side, the first vertical 3 must be 1+2 (going down), because otherwise you'd have to have 10+1=11.

>A two-digit 3 must be 1+2 (in either order)
>A two-digit 4 must be 1+3 (in either order)
>A three-digit 6 must be 1+2+3 (in some order)
>A three-digit 7 must be 1+2+4 (in some order)
etc.

File: autism.png (233KB, 1013x1047px) Image search: [Google]

233KB, 1013x1047px

>>8501819
with pleasure

File: M2UJd8P.jpg (14KB, 151x149px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 151x149px

>a system of systems of linear equations
linear algebra didn't prepare me for this

>>8502911
Why do you write your 9 as a g?

do these have unique solutions

what constraints need to be met to ensure unique solutions?

>>8503173
because I'd rather write it as a g than a q

>>8503183
>9
>g
>q
>o

>>8503191
I'm not sure what you're trying to say. How do you write a 9?

>>8503196
IIIIIIIII

File: who could it be.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>8503209

>>8502911
Thanks man

>>8503163
its still just 1 system, where the coeficient matrix hapens to have large blocks of 0s

>>8503182
>do these have unique solutions
this one obviously doesn't.

Ive already seen 2 places that you can literally insert any number less than 8 and it can still be solved.

>>8503588
>Defines a function Q(v) to be equal to the dot product v * v which is equal to //v//^2
>Not writing //v//^2 instead of Q(v)
Why did he do this? Did he define the symbol * to mean something other than dot product?

>>8504852
Nevermind, it can be seen above that ( x1 , y1 ) * ( x2 , y2 ) = x1x2 + y1y2

But that doesn't explain why he defined a function Q(v) to be equal to a vector's own dot product. What did he mean by this?

>>8504836
Where?