Ayys

>>8498849
>>8498849
Oh clearly that happened OP, no other explanation is possible, anyone trying to advance an alternate explanation is clearly just an undercover government shill trying to discredit our pursuit of knowledge and/or an idiot """"""""""scientist"""""""""" who just can't stand for their paradigm being shifted by laymen like ourselves.

Keep fighting brother.

>Later, after aviation writer Donald E. Keyhoe broke the story in his best-selling The Flying Saucer Conspiracy (1955), the Air Force insisted that the "UFO" had proved on investigation to be a Royal Canadian Air Force C-47. The F-89C had not actually collided with the Canadian transport plane, but something unspecified had happened, and the interceptor crashed. Aside from implying woeful incompetence on the radar operators' part, this "explanation" -- still the official one -- flies in the face of the Canadian government's repeated denials that any such incident involving one of its aircraft ever took place.

>>8498889
>the Canadian government's repeated denials that any such incident involving one of its aircraft ever took place.

But of course they'd say that.

>In 1958 Keyhoe got hold of a leaked Air Force document that made it clear that officialdom considered the Kinross incident a UFO encounter of the strangest kind. The document quoted these words from a radar observer who had been there: "It seems incredible, but the blip apparently just swallowed our F-89."

>In 1959 a former government official told Keyhoe that the incident was indeed a close encounter with a UFO. Moreover such encounters are common place, he cautioned Keyhoe to be wary as powerful interests were invested in keeping the existence of UFO's top secret.

File: wow.jpg (7KB, 198x201px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 198x201px

>>8498849
>Jet flies to intercept Canadian aircraft
>Flies up to it
>Crashes into lake below it
>Canadian Air Force denies involvement because their pilot never saw the jet

>implying UFOs from outerspace that can go from one planet to another could be caught in our primitive radars

Please.

>>8499005


It was teenages out on a joyride thinking it'd be funny to pull a prank on the neighbors.

>>8498966
>Air traffic controllers on the US border don't know how to identify Canadian aircraft
That's like their ONE job.

/sci/ BTFO no comebacks

File: Agent.jpg (119KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 1024x768px

>>8498849
Delete this right now.
There's nothing to see people, move along.

[eqn] \color{red} {\mathbf{(This ~~message ~~was ~~issued ~~by ~~the ~~Federal ~~Bureau ~~of ~~Investigation)} } [/eqn]

>>8499906
:/

>>8499906
Heh, make me, kid.
I'll even tell you my IP: 127.0.0.1
Come on, I'm waiting.

File: feschino.jpg (32KB, 362x475px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 362x475px

In the 1950s, after a flurry of intrusions alarmed the Truman administration, the US Air Force ordered their pilots to shoot them down as soon as they violated restricted air space around nuclear installations. Within about a year the USAF lost almost 200 fighter planes and most of their pilots. The order was then rescinded. (Stanton Friedman on KGRAradio)

File: need_to_know2.png (54KB, 545x205px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 545x205px

"Mr. President, anyone who can cross millions of miles of space will be able to take care of themselves when they get there. Don't start something you can't finish." (Albert Einstein talking to President Truman on July 19, 1952)

"We have stacks of reports about flying saucers. We take them seriously when you consider we have lost many men and planes trying to intercept them." (Gen Benjamin Chidlaw, Head of Air Defense Command, 1953)

>>8498849
Gb2 >>>/x/ with your AYY LMAO nonsense.

Litetally everything any other sequence of events within known physical laws is more likely than extraterrestrial visitation. How about a midair collision with an FAA-unregistered or Soviet spy aircraft? There's a lot that can go wrong with aviation.

>>8500129
If there was a collison a) wreckage would have been found b) someone would have reported another plane missing c) both radar blips would have ended; you can't crash into a plane and have the other one continue on as normal
>Soviet spy aircraft
Reconnaissance aircraft fly at altitudes way higher than fighter jets. Furthermore the Soviets were well known for not using U2-tier spy aircraft because a) they had nothing with the capability b) they just used their satellites c) The USA wasn't a very secretive country, just buy a map.

>>8498849
test