Explain.

From the last thread I saw this in, I believe it had something to do with Schrodinger's explanation of modern particle physics.

Not my field at all, I am but a humble engineer tending to my gears.

it says you're gay

>>8492948
That too

>>8492941
It proves that
physics==ugly

>>8492941
The Lagrangian for the Standard Model.

Heres an explanation of the terms.
http://einstein-schrodinger.com/Standard_Model.pdf

Enjoy.

File: 1467344739886.png (229KB, 650x461px) Image search: [Google]

229KB, 650x461px

>>8493135
>make up a bunch of symbols and assign them arbitrary values
>can't explain dark energy
>can't explain the em drive
>doesn't include general relativity
>no unified theory
>can't even tell me why my bicycle stays upright

physics is a sham

File: smug13.png (36KB, 268x237px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 268x237px

>>8493135
The Lagrangian for the standard model is
[eqn]
\mathcal{L} = \int_M \bar{\psi}\gamma^{\mu}\nabla_\mu \psi - \frac{1}{4g^2}\int_M \operatorname{tr}F^2
[/eqn]
where [math]\psi \in \mathcal{H}_P[/math] is the quantized section [math]\psi: Q = M/P \rightarrow B = P(M,SU(5))[/math] on the leaves [math]Q[/math] of the polarization [math]P[/math] on the symplectic manifold [math]M[/math], [math]\nabla[/math] is the connection on the Hermitian principal line bundle [math]B = P(M,SU(5))[/math], and [math]F \in \Omega^{2}(M) \otimes \mathfrak{su}(5)[/math] is the curvature of [math]\nabla[/math] pulled back along the projection [math]M \rightarrow Q[/math], my little undergrad. That horrid mess in the OP is for experimentalists.

>>8493301
No it isn't.