A simple test

{...,493, 509, 514, 518, 524, ...} is it correct?

>>8478510
oddly enough, all apply the rule except for 493

what rule did you apply?

>>8478462
Bump

>>711941137
he seems to have solved it

509, 514, 518, 524, 529, 536

>>8478543
give me any other set of numbers that apply your rule please

>>8478516
He copy pasted your numbers dumbass

>>8478575
doing 3 things at the same time can get pretty overwhelming when you're high as a kite tho :D

Numbers get larger

>>8478577
they do indeed, but its not bound to be like that

File: MathChecksOut.png (6KB, 446x187px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 446x187px

>>8478462
The math checks out guys.

>>8478572
Im not op

>>8478637
>>8478572
Just subtract 500 from each number, i guess

>>8478462
527, 534, 536, ...

>>8478462
..., 509, 514, 518, 524, 527, 530, 532, 534, 536?

OP is dead

529,536?

>>8478462
Obviously your rule is a polynomial of degree 3 that fits the given data at the points 0,1,2,3.

P=(7*x^3)/2 - 11*x^2 + (25*x)/2 + 509 is exactly that polynomial (the only one).

the series continues: P(-1)=482 and P(4)=607.

>>8479537
>the only one
The only one of degree three isn't it?

>>8479560
Yes. There are infinitely many for degree greater 3 but only 1 for degree 3.

>>8479537
So, OP made a mistake when writting? It should be, 514, 518, 542 not 524?

There can be so many numbers that would fit given the data.
Give us more numbers if you want a specific answer.

>>8478575
he added one at the beginning dumbass

>>8478516
You can't be this stupid.

>>8479627
Sorry, I fucked up.
(9007199254740733*x^3)/18014398509481984 - (281474976710629*x^2)/140737488355328 + (1829587348619133*x)/281474976710656 + 509
Is the right polynomial.

P(4)=535
P(-1)=500