Greatest genius

Archimedes, Bill Evans

Ken Boner

One of them is Joseph Fourier.

>>8476357
I would guess probably like Gauss, Newton, Von Neumann, or Grothendieck, but I haven't actually studied their work directly enough to gauge that and don't pay close enough attention to the history behind the math I'm learning to know who contributed what to any given field. Based on the work I'm most familiar with, I would say:

Scientific would be either Richard Montague, Noam Chomsky, or Alfred Tarski.

For artistic, I would say Sergei Rachmaninoff, Alexander Scriabin, or Chopin. However, I also really like Dostoevsky and Kafka if were looking at writers.

The single greatest mind overall, I think though, is Wittgenstein, but philosophers are neither artists nor scientists.

On a related note, the most difficult subject matter in the maths/sciences are like branches of proof theory that are highly topological and draw on various branches of abstract algebra and topology. Shit is almost impossible. Maybe in a few years it'll start to come together.

>>8476357
Paul Erdos (Math) and Zoltan Kodaly (Music)

Both are hungarians, fucking hungary you badass mothefucker

>>8476392
Numberphile? I'm sorry, I watch Wildberger classes.

>>8476420
Why Wittgenstein?

>>8476420
this wildberger shitposting is getting out of hand.

File: grothendieck.jpg (103KB, 620x372px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 620x372px

or Wittgenstein

Nikola Tesla

BillNye

>>8476357

karl friston and khabib nurmagomedov

>>8476357
wildberger, zizek

File: disnigga.gif (3MB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 400x400px

>>8476357

Kurt Godel, Jerry Garcia

>>8476420

pick one faggot

>>8476357
Brunelleschi, Brunelleschi

>>8477393

Ravioli Ravielli

>>8476357
von neumann 6th post, shameful

greatest brain power: von neumann

greatest lasting impact: who knows, it will take a long time to fully realise the implications of these intellectual titan's discoveries.

probably newton though, because he accelerated understanding of fundamental things so profoundly for the entire world.

the next newton will be more abstract, eg his work will lead to a new revolution such as FTL travel or something like that, which we wont realise for a long time to come

>>8476357
>scientific
Einstein

>artistic
Michelangelo

>>8476357
>Math
Euler
>Physics
Newton
>Music
Bach the Elder
>Paint
Raphael
>Words
Shakespear

>>8477440
African music was actually more complex than any of that Euro trash shit

>>8477440
Most of Shakespear's stuff has been found to be cowritten.

>>8477446

Joke's on you, I actually really like African music.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEwnHf9Q23k

>>8477455

Yeah, no, it hasn't.

>>8477405

KEK

>>8477459
Not a home to spoon feed some sources but there has been Stylometry studies they've done with computers in recent years that makes it seem that most of his works weren't purely his own.

>>8477467
http://shakespeareauthorship.com/

>>8477446
>>8477456

Behold the most complex music ever.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLtpJebnfHU

>>8477382
Okay
Scientific - Alfred Tarski
Musical - Scriabin
Literary - Dostoevsky
Philosophical - Wittgenstein

>>8476357
Not saying Da Vinci for both.. wtf /sci

>>8477446
(You)

>>8477484
this

>>8477480
tarski?

what he do?

>>8476357
Probably someone who was crap at socializing and died alone and unrecognized.

>>8477440

The essential normcore

>>8477455
>Shakespear
>not Sheikh Spa'kha-ir
Decolonize your mind you filthy brown erasuring shitlord

Werner Heisenberg

>>8476357
>Maths
Archimedes, Descartes
>Science
Newton
>Music
J. S. Bach
>Paint
Velazquez
>Literature
Dostoevski
>Sculpture
Bernini

File: 1478565944644.jpg (41KB, 580x720px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 580x720px

>>8476357
>For you

heh

>>8477526
proved 1=2 in a way that is acceptable to modern 'logicians'

he's wild

>artistic
Me.

>>8478386
Cannot agree with Bach here. Homie used strict mathematical theory to his compositions and had not an ounce of emotion compared to romaticists and post-romanticists

File: hqdefault.jpg (8KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 480x360px

>>8478801

Isaac newton for sure

>>8476357
Newton was autismo supreme, and remained eternally butthurt that the rest of the world didn't about his own personal notation.

Da Vinci

always has been, always will be

>>8476420
>Chopin
>No Bach or Bethoven
Why?

>>8476420

>not literally picking Lord Kelvin or James Clerk Maxwell

>>8478386

>Archimedes, Descartes

I guess. How about Euler or Fermat?

>Newton

Good pick. I'd opine most would pick him or Einstein. Me? I'd pick Rutherford or Faraday. Or even Seaborg

>Bach

No no no....Debussy!

>Paint

Cezzanne

>Dostoevski

Good pick. Mine would easily be Frost (in my youth), Hemingway (currently)

>Bernini

No argument there

Good picks anon.

>Math
Euler
>Science
Hamilton & Lagrange
>Painting
Picasso
>Music
Kanye West

>>8480123

>Kanye West

Holup nig

me

>>8476357
Ten greatest, without regard to what discipline they were in:

Archimedes
Leonhard Euler
Nikola Tesla
John von Neumann
Carl Gauss
Aristotle
Immanuel Kant
Isaac Newton
Leonardo da Vinci
Gottfried Leibniz

>>8476357
Kolmogorov.

/thread