Last night there was a 7.5 magnitude earthquake in New Zealand. People are saying it was because the moon was slightly closer to the earth last night. Are they right..?
>>8473221
>independant.co.uk
>>8473221
Unlikely. Moving the crust is a whole hell of a lot harder than moving the sea.
>>8473221
No..
Project Black Star
That's fucking retarded
>>8473221
>someone posts science related article
>suddenly all your highschool dropout facebook friends have a B.Sc.
moon effects large bodies of liquid such as oceans
can moon effect magma under the crust?
>>8473221
>"No evidence that the moon doesn't cause earthquakes!"
geologists on suicide watch
>>8473221
I see that Ken M just has his name to Justin Williams.
Geology student here. We talked about another example last year when an Earthquake occurred and everyone wanted to relate it to some weather event.
Birthday problem
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birthday_problem
Basically we have about a dozen major earthquakes a year. Because important events happen and because earthquakes happen, you are bound to have some correlation when comparing each earthquake to something important. It is inevitable. Does the important 'thing' cause the earthquake? Well, good luck with that.
Its probably not significsnt enough to be worth mentioning or even studying, but I don't see why the moon's gravity couldn't be a contributing factor.
It would have to be a fault that's about ready to move anyway, but the tidal force could be the straw that breaks the camel's back.
>>8473221
Are they right..?
Does a bear shit in outer space?
>>8473239
the moon doesn't just move the sea. It moves the crust to. look up body tide