This is the objective true nature of existence distilled to be understood.
When I meme myself by forgetting to link my theory ;^)
https://1drv.ms/w/s!AshN1BJh7gg5lwFO1FRIypYGOrRx
Bumping because importance
>>8469652
big bang is becoming a meme. not even a joke.
>>8469757
It was always a meme friendo, we just didn't realize it ;)
>Assigning importance to language games, the pdf
>>8470830
It's not a language game; I address the basic reasoning most people use to justify their supposed existence and point out that it is flawed, and then provide new reasoning that is not flawed.
If you think I am concealing the truth with language, point out where and how please :)
>the reaction of everyone who reads this thread by the process of thinking that they exist
>>8470980
You aren't even an infinitesimal fraction as clever or funny or intelligent as you think you are.
>>8470859
>I address the basic reasoning most people use to justify their supposed existence and point out that it is flawed, and then provide new reasoning that is not flawed
You don't do any of this. You can't even differentiate logical instantiation from physical manifestation.
>>8471169
If that is true, demonstrate it to be true. I don't believe you know what you're talking about, and you can prove I don't know what I'm talking about just by putting a little effort in; so do it, if you're right, and if you don't, then I assert it is because you were wrong.
>>8471165
That's cool man, but you actually have to use science to tell me I'm wrong, because I couldn't really care less about your subjective opinions of me as a person. I want your objective opinion of my ideas.
>>8471228
>you actually have to use science to tell me I'm wrong
I'm not trying to tell you you're wrong--that goes without saying--but merely bringing your attention to yourself and your lack of certain qualities you seem to believe you possesses.
You're also a shit troll. For demonstration, see this thread.
>>8471261
>>>8471228
>>you actually have to use science to tell me I'm wrong
>I'm not trying to tell you you're wrong--that goes without saying
Fuck haha this is hilarious. Good stuff man.
OP you need to apply some critical thinking to your arguments and think of the definitions of the words you are using. Every step of your arguments (I didnt read very far) is either very vague or just wrong.
Let's do an example to show your first proof is stupid: substite the word life for any other word and you prove that the nature of pizza is to survive. And step 1 is wrong, things that exist might not survive.
And the hypothesis you are working on makes no sense. You need to put it in concrete terms and not in wordplay.
>>8471261
It doesn't go without saying :)
You wouldn't know what I think of myself mate.
I'm not trolling, this is a legitimate scientific theory. It's science.
>>8471417
You're just wrong friend, I guarantee I'm more gifted in language than you. If you think I misuse language be specific about how I obscure meaning.
No... this is not true. Things that are not life exist perpetually until destroyed without attempting to survive against other things like it, lol. Therefore, pizza does not need to survive to continue to exist in that state - it is already not alive, so how could it even attempt to survive...
If they do not survive they cease to exist practically immediately. In terms of the scope of existence, they can essentially be said to exist only as a ghost of a possibility of life, if that life never survives conception.
It's not fucking wordplay, just because you're retarded and don't understand language doesn't mean my use of language is flawed; I am very skilled in English. Point out where you think I am using wordplay and I will explain your misunderstandings for you mate.
>>8471347
Yeah it's not a joke, but I'm glad you get a laugh out of the joke that has always been your existence ;)
>thinking you exist in 2016