Can you pass a basic voter literacy test?
These were designed to have ambiguous, questionable answers you knob.
>>8464020
The only one that isn't perfectly clear and logical is 6.
>>8463985
Did I pass?
>>8464058
They are up to interpretation to an extent. Like 12, what does it even mean for a line start at the circle 2 and pass under it. Id interpret it one way that I feel meets the requirement, but thats a bullshit question and I can see it being a trick.
>>8464069
You idiot. This is so embarrassing. Go back to kindergarten.
>>8464073
racist
>>8463985
wtf that shit's confusing
>>8464069
>1
>8
>10
>13
here is part 2 btw
>>8464070
Guess you can't vote sir. Try again in 4 years.
>>8464081
is this seriously real?
how many amerifats could possibly do this in 10min
>>8464105
it's for excluding illiterate blacks in the early 20th century.
>>8464105
You don't have to complete it if you're white and voting for the correct candidate
>>8464105
whats it like not being able to read at a 5th grade level? can you even read this?
>>8464069
Umm, we'll call you.
This is less than half of the full test
>>8464081
>Spell backwards, forwards
What
>>8464069
You put a slash mark through the numbers in 12 when it clearly states to cross them out.
>>8464184
You have to spell the phrase "backwards, forwards".
>>8464233
Confusing af no wonder why blacks couldn't vote back then.
Is this a real test? If so, that's so obviously deliberately misleading that it's no wonder people are so up in arms about racism.
>>8464081
At least these are less ambiguous than the first part.
>>8464058
Ok, brain genius How do you draw a line around something? See question 4
don't forget, you only have 10 minutes anon
>>8463985
>draw a line AROUND
this test is impossible
>>8464069
Are you white?
>>8464418
And a single wrong answer is a complete failure
>>8464081
Only have an issue with 17 and 18. There's not enough information given to find a correct answer.
>>8464105
You didn't have to take the test if you were white. It was just a thinly veiled method to keep black people from voting
I get to thinking about how both of my parents would fail this and I just get mad. I would punch a poll attendee in the teeth if he pulled this.So glad this is no longer in practice.
>>8464418
>20 seconds a question
>you have to spend about that long on average being absolutely sure that you're not falling for some trick
What the hell is this?
>>8464791
a literacy test from the 60s to vote