Math + Theoretical CS

File: CS guide.png (178KB, 1068x1142px) Image search: [Google]

178KB, 1068x1142px

>>8463693
Because undergrad CS is a horrific waste of time. Just self study it.

>>8463704

You could make a list like this for literally any program of study.

>Implying CS = programming

File: CS.png (886KB, 1170x500px) Image search: [Google]

886KB, 1170x500px

>>8463822
>>Implying CS = programming
>Too stupid to read the image

CS is a joke

File: NnKLtho.jpg (55KB, 755x568px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 755x568px

>>8463887
I did read the image, and yes messah, lotsa math on there.

The point is you can make a list like this for any program of study; this image is bad evidence that CS is "self study-able".

Now what is self studyable is programming - that you def don't need uni for. So if you claim that "CS is self-studyable", you're only right if you're just talking about programming

>>8463913
Anything is self-studyable

>>8463913
>So if you claim that "CS is self-studyable", you're only right if you're just talking about programming

http://www.scotthyoung.com/blog/mit-challenge/

Even a business major can self study CS in less than a year

>>8463704

I'm doing what the OP is talking about, and it really seems like a good way to go about doing things, at least for me.

It basically just adds a little bit of extra add-on
fluff that makes my math degree more employable. What is wrong with that?