Alternative Science Theories?

File: TimeTravel.jpg (621KB, 2348x2336px) Image search: [Google]

621KB, 2348x2336px

>>8460418
How about TimeTravel?

>>8460438
where does that image com from? I love diagrams like this, I hope it's in a big fancy picture book ic an go buy.

>>8460446
No idea where the image is from, but there's a poster you can buy

http://www.christies.com/lotfinder/Lot/paul-laffoley-american-b-1940-geochronmechane-5464364-details.aspx

But as for a better quality, I don't think I was able to find anything better.

>>8460455
Shame there's no better version. Want to know what the "time antenna" did.

>>8460463
Here's the information I could find on that particular diagram.

https://books.google.com/books?id=SdpAB7sbkZwC&pg=PT88&lpg=PT88&dq=Geochronmechane:+The+Time+Machine+from+the+Earth&source=bl&ots=sowIrjm5_8&sig=-9KDVrC_-maQaV0CHp_8tqlLN70&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj9oem7xZXQAhXFiFQKHf4YAE8Q6AEIVTAO#v=onepage&q=Geochronmechane%3A%20The%20Time%20Machine%20from%20the%20Earth&f=false

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYr21sQbuqs

It seems to be some kind of art mixed in with theory? I'm not sure.

File: Aether Unit.jpg (25KB, 400x646px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 400x646px

What are these called? Alternative theories? Fringe science theories?

File: grdchart.gif (767KB, 2498x4000px) Image search: [Google]

767KB, 2498x4000px

As long as we're posting this bullshit...

>>8460418
>>>/x/

>>>/x/

>>>/x/

>>8461040
>handles the primary reason for amnesia on the whole track

What does this even mean?

>>8460418
What the fuck am I looking at

>>8460418
>string theorists actually believe this

>>8460418
>alternative
OK, how does this "Gordon Model" predict the paramagnetism of diatomic oxygen?

The standard model.

Just released today:
http://phys.org/news/2016-11-theory-gravity-dark.html

The paper:
https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.02269

>>8463115
I love how people with superficial knowledge crusade to defeat theories which aren't in vogue

>>8463613
That's not a theory it's a hypothesis.

>>8463628
Layers and layers of abstracted trust. Defending something you didn't prove
with work that isn't yours. Puppet regurgitation, circumscribing the anals of
academia. That's the bitter truth.

>>8463628
>>8463636
But really, that's the best you got? Semantics? I just prodded at your design flaw. Flicked at it with a blade to chip the paint and you want to argue definitions. Density is apparently shallow.