just wondering?

If it hasn't spaghettified it will keep falling and eventually spaghettify.

It stumbles into an alternate dimension where everything is super fucking gay

>>8454964
So, your bedroom?

>>8454956
Your modern physics has it wrong, but in the real universe the object will first be ripped apart from tidal forces(nothing changed here), before it is shoot out deeper into the "time" dimension, into "orbit". Now its obviously not the time dimension like modern physics thinks about it, it is an actual spacial place where all particles move through and interact(Light too, but it is a bit different.).
They will stay in the backhole until they gradually loose all their kinetic energy through very slightly heating up space"time" around the BH(this isn't different from normal particles by the way.), When enough of the particles lose enough energy, the BH will explode back again.
The particles in the backhole is still part of our normal space"time", but their "time" orbits are now so curved that they never reach the region of space in the center of the BH, but they still move in their "time"orbits. They don't interact with each other, space is too rigid inside to alow it.

My explanation is a bit wrong in order to simplify it, but it is basically what happens.

it gets on the floor, and walks the dinosaur

>>8454987
>>8454989

2 kinds of people

>>8454987
So it just never reaches any destination.

>>8454956
>what happens to an object when it enters a black hole

The mathematical model describing the object and the black hole breaks down.

Lol Singularity!

>>8455753
In our perceivable space, it doesn't, its particles still keeps their momentum and energy though, but pretty much all interactions are gone, now they only interact as one on the surrounding spacetime. You see there is only a small part of sparetime where particles interact strongly, in BH's they never reach those parts again, until the BH collapses.

Matter and energy within a blackhole cannot interact with matter/energy outside the black hole. This is the very definition of a pocket dimension or alternate universe, is it not?

The real question is, can matter/energy in the blackhole interact with other stuff in the blackhole?

>>8454956
There's actually no scientific consensus about that. Classically, if the black hole is large such that the singularity is "far from the event horizon" (or better said, the event horizon has a low surface curvature), you would not even realize you enter the black hole. From your perspective, nothing changes. (for small black holes you would feel tidal forces)
But that is only classically and like so often, quantum theory fucks up stuff. There is a theory where the Black Hole becomes very hot from your perspective as you enter it and you burn to death at the event horizon (Firewall).

Stephen Hawking even suggested that Black Holes might not exist at all.

TLDR: No one really knows at the moment.

>>8456528
>Stephen Hawking even suggested that Black Holes might not exist at all.
You're thinking of event horizons.

>>8456591
The event horizon is a defining property of a black hole. A black hole is a part of spacetime from which every future oriented timelike curve ends within finite length. If there was no event horizon, this property is no longer fulfilled.