Pretty pictures: OC edition

File: 20160121_144812.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

>>8454878
Recrystallized paracetamol from acetone

File: 20160628_204947.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>8454883
Sulfur recrystallized from toleuene

File: 20160629_113040.jpg (3MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3264x2448px

>>8454885
Some KMnO4

File: 20160701_231152.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>8454888
Benzoic acid

File: 1467143994209.jpg (3MB, 2448x3264px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2448x3264px

>>8454890
Another run of benzoic acid synth and recrystallization

>>8454898
I don't get it why it's so streched out. Now it certainly isn't as pretty as before.

File: minecraft.jpg (161KB, 625x625px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 625x625px

dude you some kind of freak? wtf.

>>8454911
Now what would make you say such a thing?

File: unspecified.jpg (110KB, 960x1280px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 960x1280px

>>8454916
come on dude youre creeping me out..

File: 1.jpg (292KB, 533x800px) Image search: [Google]

292KB, 533x800px

>>8454898
Not OC but still looks cool

File: 1.jpg (65KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 720x960px

Old picture of my ghetto reflux set-up

File: 0627161419.jpg (3MB, 4160x2340px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4160x2340px

>>8455115
Muh makeshift hydrogenation apparatus

It....uh...didnt work

>>8455190
Is that a balloon? Did you just put hydrogen in there?
Also what did you try to hydrogenate?

File: IMGP7615-2.jpg (210KB, 1000x665px) Image search: [Google]

210KB, 1000x665px

Bald ass eagle

File: IMGP9995-2.jpg (789KB, 1000x665px) Image search: [Google]

789KB, 1000x665px

>>8456601
some mf mallards

File: photo 1.png (412KB, 360x640px) Image search: [Google]

412KB, 360x640px

>>8454878
if you want pretty pictures of crystals lookup birefringence. Pic related, its a pic I took thru microscope of crystallised BHT

File: bacteriapapes.jpg (419KB, 2400x2400px) Image search: [Google]

419KB, 2400x2400px

the CDC has a pretty nice collection of bacteria images

>>8454878
enjoy your cacer chemfag

>>8457175
I actually spilt some chromic acid a few weeks ago. Wiped it up and I think a bit got on my finger, so we're probably on with the cancer.

File: IMG_20161027_131821975.jpg (3MB, 4160x2340px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4160x2340px

Here's an HE plate cultured with some opportunistic enteric bacteria

File: IMG_20161025_135623317.jpg (3MB, 4160x2340px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4160x2340px

>>8457194
Another HE plate with Salmonella

Those yellow/orange colonies mutated to ferment lactose. Kinda spooky

File: IMG_20161025_130621993.jpg (2MB, 2340x4160px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2340x4160px

>>8457208
A blurry Mycobacterium culture. Looks like mini string cheese or that crap that clogs up your pores

File: IMG_20161011_131211443_HDR.jpg (2MB, 4160x2340px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4160x2340px

>>8457218
Staph aureus on a blood agar plate with a novobiocin tablet to determine susceptibility

S. aureus will fuck your shit up look at all that hydrolyzed blood senpai

>>8457194
>>8457208
OP here. These are amazing. On the second picture did the yellow colonies mutate by themself or was it intentional?

File: (x*x*y << 11)&1.png (6KB, 256x256px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 256x256px

>>8454878

this is the picture that appears in "The art of computer programming: bitwise tricks"

I think the title is wrong though, and it's backwards

>>8457232
We think it mutated by itself. There may have been some interaction between the Salmonella and Shigella species on that plate that enabled the lactose fermentation but it's largely a mystery

File: (x*y)^x.png (473KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

473KB, 1000x1000px

>>8457238

File: x and y.png (14KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 1000x1000px

>>8457242

not a duplicate reply

File: x xor y.png (10KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 1000x1000px

>>8457246

File: Screenshot from 2016-11-05 15:08:43.png (12KB, 997x993px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 997x993px

2016 in a version of Jacob Barnett numbers using lines to represent 2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hP-DZMmQBng

File: 3x.png (20KB, 972x972px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 972x972px

>>8457249

>>8457240
Biology is fascinating. It's so spontanus and unpredictable. Just wow

File: 2050.png (48KB, 996x915px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 996x915px

>>8457259


this is 2050

>>8457259
>>8457265
I was thinking about this the other day. How do you think he represents 4, or 8, or 16? I think since he rotates the shape 180 degrees whenever multiplying by two, if you want to represent 2*2 you need to move into 3 dimensions, basically a plus sign that comes out of the screen. If you want to represent 8, you need to move up to 4D, and so on. Maybe this is how Barnett visualizes higher dimensions so easily?

File: Perfect.gif (2MB, 350x1008px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 350x1008px

It's just pretty

>>8457259
>>8457265
>Jacob Barnett numbers
this shit is just fucking stupid man im sorry

File: Screenshot from 2016-11-05 16:29:31.png (19KB, 973x981px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 973x981px

>>8457300

Powers of 2 on this program are just single straight lines. This is just because it allows me to use the same geometry shader for all shapes, and not handle any inconsistencies. What it does is takes 2pi, divides by the number of sides to get an increment, and then iterates through generating points with the given angle.

Ideally, I think it would be best to define all shapes using this algorithm because it is more consistent. One change I might make is have the starting angle be normal to the unit circle, instead of always being 0. It wouldn't even be that hard to implement, I would only have to change the geometry shader.

The only problem is what to do with the first line. I would probably just make it so you can toggle which of the two starting positions you want

>>8457348

I get it anon, I am jealous of the kid as well.

>>8454885
nah that's an onion

>>8457481
Looks more like sauerkraut to me haha

>>8457231
So what would happen if it got in your system via IV?

>>8457468
>Powers of 2 on this program are just single straight lines.
So 2 looks the same as 4 looks the same as 8 and so on? All of them just straight lines?
Also for >>8457265
Why did you start out with a straight line instead of a pentagon, or a 41-gon? When you did it here >>8457259 you started out with the highest prime factor which seems like the logical starting point.

>>8458944

it starts with the factors in order of smallest to largest, and it lets you cycle through all possible permutations.

also you can fuck with the proportions, which can be pretty trippy. If I had stuck with keeping them overlapped like the kid does in the video, this Sierpinski triangle made by powers of 3 wouldn't have formed because it requires the triangles to be as close as possible without overlapping, for example.

>>8458944

and yes, all powers of 2 look the exact same