>leave mathematics to me!--t.mochizuki
>>8442071
Imagine getting one of the signs wrong in that
>>8442071
except that's from Alain Connes
how do you even grasp what's written here?
>>8442083
If you know what kinds of particles are in the standard model and how they interact it isn't that difficult to put it together.
>>8442083
PEMDAS NIGGA
>>8442071
what the fuck is this from, and why is it so god damn ugly.
>>8442619
I'ts Schlodingers Formula to hiz pu$$ycat!
Is there any introduction to the standard model written for mathematicians?
the elegance of all of the generalizations of classical physics to higher order theories leads me to believe that the massive shitpile that is the standard model is just a special case of a more general, more beautiful thing
is this a common feeling or just
>math major tries to think about physics
>>8443151
>Is there any introduction to the standard model written for mathematicians?
Noncommutative Geometry and Particle Physics by Walter D. van Suijlekom
>>8442083
Well it is supposed to have context
>>8442071
What the fuck is this? Does it even have meaning?
>>8443538
It's literally bullshit. Just a mishmash of a bunch of equations that is completely meaningless. Wow, the linear combination of some random physical laws gives us some super special magic number. What a load of garbage. This is why nobody takes physicists seriously.
>>8443538
standard model of particle physics
>>8443555
you should probably commit sudoku bro
>>8443346
I have this same feeling, so I guess you're right
(I'm a math major too, heh)
>>8443604
It should be denoted though that not all terms in there are physical. Some are gauge fixing terms.
>>8443428
Thanks!
>>8443572
Why? I'm right.