What's the answer? And what's the method?

To not be a tremendous faggot is the answer.
To notice faggoty ass patterns is the method.

3624 {60,72,80,90,96}

What's the answer?

>>8441058
3224 are the first 4 digits, cbf finding last 2

322464

>>8442421
What's the Trick to get last two digits.

>>8441058
8+4+6 equals 18 by definition.

>>8442497
It's just my guess after doing a system of equations.

>>8442421
How?

>>8442538
Show us your work, please.

322497
Piss easy

>>8442552
show your fucking work

File: IMG_20161028_123437.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

FUUUUUUUUCCKKK HOW DO YOU GET THE LAST 2

>>8442541>>8442541
>>8442541
It's probably wrong, but I just set up a 3×3 augmented with the last two digit numbers as solutions and solved the matrix.

>>8442647
It's probably something numerologically retarded, not solving a matrix. Otherwise normies wouldn't be able to spam facebook with it and act all smug.

File: gh.jpg (3MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4032x3024px

the funny thing is I originally thought the pattern was something else and only realized I was wrong after I had started working out the process behind getting the answer

File: badcrop.png (935KB, 748x943px) Image search: [Google]

935KB, 748x943px

>>8442695
woops here's a better version

>>8442713
that's way better than anything I've thought of so far, but you missed at step on your solution,
19 is the difference between the differences and not the difference itself, so the number you're subtracting from 72 should be 14 +/- 19
...which brings up a new problem, how do you decide whether it's 33 or -5?
(sorry if I crashed your party)

fuck it, I give up, maybe this is just a troll

>>8442764
woopsy! I think you're right that the answer would then be either 33 or -5, but I would have to go with 33 since it looks like the differences decrease first 13 to 9 to 0 then increase from 0 to 14 to __. In this case 33, I think

>>8442781
There's another version of this question where you can get the last two digits through

(ab + ac) - c

and then reversing the number

>>8442801
then we encounter another problem though, on the first one you subtracted 22 from 35 instead of visa verse like the other ones, if we're not going with absolute value it should be -13 instead

>>8442826
Yeah I guess I was only going for difference in absolute value. If it is the case that we must consider differences being negative then I think finding a pattern would be much more difficult, if possible at all. I would bet that I'm right though, since otherwise it would probably hugely overcomplicate the problem and these sorts of problems are usually simpler than we expect.

>>8441058

322471

>>8441058
>8 unkowns
>5 equations
impossible

File: tumblr_inline_nt0vm22PRG1spsojg_400.jpg (20KB, 306x306px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 306x306px

>>8443005
that's 6 not 8

>>8441084
Fpbp

>>8441058
8 + 4 + 6 = 32, 24, 71.

Explanation :

The four digits of numbers are multiplied by each other.
4 + 7 + 2 = (4 * 7) and (7 * 2).
= 2814.
7 + 3 + 9 = (7 * 3) and (3 * 9).
= 2127.
6 + 2 + 7 = (6 * 2) and (2 * 7).
= 1214.
2 + 8 + 5 = (2 * 8) and (8 * 5).
= 1640.
8 + 4 + 6 = (8 * 4) and (4 * 6).
= 3224.

To find the 5th digit for the series.
4 + 7 + 2 = 3 (ie) first digit - 1 = 4 - 1 = 3.
7 + 3 + 9 = 8 (ie) first digit + 1 = 7 + 1 = 8.
6 + 2 + 7 = 5 (ie) first digit - 1 = 6 - 1 = 5.
2 + 8 + 5 = 3 (ie) first digit + 1 = 2 + 1 = 3.
8 + 4 + 6 = 7 (ie) first digit - 1 = 8 - 1 = 7.

To find the last Number of equations.

Add the digits on L.H.S, and add first number of R.H.S, then write down the units place digit.
4 + 7 + 2 = 13. So, 13+ 2 =15.
Unit Digit = 5.
7 + 3 + 9 = 19. So, 19 + 2 = 21.
Unit Digit = 1.
6 + 2 + 7 = 15. So, 15 + 1 = 16.
Unit Digit = 6.
2 + 8 + 5 = 15. So, 15 + 1 = 16.
Unit Digit = 6.
8 + 4 + 6 = 18. So 18 + 3 = 21.
Unit Digit = 1.

Then the value for 8 + 4 + 6 is 322471.

There, now we can lay this all to rest.

>>8444624
You were too slow >>8442981

>>8443145
>tumblr