What causes the wave function to collapse?
no such thing
>>8435037
u wot m8
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_function_collapse
>>8435066
>>8435065
I in fact have studied QM.
Collapsing wave functions only make sense if you adopt some nonsensical interpretation of QM.
See wiki:
The existence of the wave function collapse is required in
the Copenhagen interpretation
the objective collapse interpretations
the transactional interpretation
the von Neumann interpretation in which consciousness causes collapse.
On the other hand, the collapse is considered a redundant or optional approximation in
the Consistent histories approach, self-dubbed "Copenhagen done right"
the Bohm interpretation
the Many-worlds interpretation
the Ensemble Interpretation
>>8435024
you do, by observing it
>>8435024
consciousness, duh
>>8435081
>many worlds interpretation
>not nonsensical
You've got to be shitting me
is it some weird interaction Hamiltonian? can you have some kind of deterministic wavefunction collapse?
>participating the meme hobby of quantum "mechanics"
>>8435098
What's nonsensical about it?
>>8435484
>what's nonsensical about the mwi
I don't know, maybe every single thing about it?
>>8436275
Not an argument
>>8436280
Well, there's no clear argument for the support of the MWI neither.
How can one argue against nonsense?
>>8435484
oh noes, does electron go left or right?
huge problem
yay solution, new univrerses pop up left AND right.... yeah right buddy
>>8435024
Adding a second dimension of time collapses the wave function. The math involved is... complicated to put it lightly.
Though you can collapse the wave function by simply inventing a nutrino microscope. Which is difficult but not impoosible.