request to find pic

>>8413367
it's weed

(3S,4S,6R,7S)-6,7-diamino-3-(2,2-dichloroacetyl)-4- (3-ethynylphenyl)-8,8,8-trifluoro-2-iminooctanoic acid

Doesn't seem to be a known structure.

>>8414317
Then why does it have a name?

Checkmate, scientists.

>>8413367
This structure looks very comfy
We'd be honored if you included it in the comfy structures thread >>8389930

>>8414497
That's just standard IUPAC nomenclature, the actual molecule has many stereo isomers, thanks to the stereogenic centers. Anon merely meant op's pic related does not have a commonly known function or street name.

> Your move, layman.

>>8413367
>what is steric factor
it doesn't exist

>>8413367
there is no molecule like this or some related structure

File: 1476509923058.png (29KB, 1072x680px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 1072x680px

>>8413367
I've never done much chemisteriey, but I think I found some clues. I'd call it. Chicken molecule.

File: molecule.jpg (88KB, 1072x680px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 1072x680px

>>8413367
I'm no chemist but this doesn't seem possible to me.

>>8415814
Why not? Each carbon has 4 bonds.

>>8415814
>I'm no chemist
it shows

File: 1454828822543.jpg (120KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 1280x720px

>>8413367

>trifluoromethylated vicinal diamine
>one ketone selectively converted to an imine and remains that way despite turbo-enoliseable alpha proton
>highly activated ketone 4 carbons away from a free amine

>>8415831
>>8415836
I thought the more bounds the more unstable a liaison is?

>>8415859

What, you mean like in a nitrogen molecule?

>>8415862
I don't know. Like I said, I'm no chemist.
But it seems a triple bond between Nitrogens is more stable than a triple bond between Carbons.
http://chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/13562/why-is-n%E2%82%82-stable-but-hcn-and-c%E2%82%82h%E2%82%82-unstable

>>8415836
>>8415831
He's right though, the angle in the drawing is impossible

File: DontBMaddB.jpg (6KB, 206x218px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 206x218px

>>8415814
carbon and hydro atoms in skeletal structures are often omitted. Case in point, look at the rest of the fucking lines on the thing.

>>8415814
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alkyne

>>8414317
He didn't assign stereochemistry bruh, what are you on about?

>>8415814
>>8415831
>>8415836
>>8415859
>>8416304
>>8417439

Triple bonds (alkynes) are at a 180 degree angle (not turned), they'd be way too unstable at that angle, unless of course OP drew it without caring for that

>>8417454
>Triple bonds (alkynes) are at a 180 degree angle
That is the equilibrium geometry, yes. They do have a bending degree of freedom though
It's not that uncommon to draw them at a slight angle for structural clarity, or when you run out of space. He's clearly not suggesting it's some magic pentavalent carbon, so there's no ambiguity even if it is technically poor form

desu I think your friend royally fucked up drawing a polypeptide

>>8417500
lmao i think you're right

>>8415772
Definitely a kitchen though. That egg is in a frying pan