Are there any legit alternative theories to human evolution?

Alternative in what way?

File: MPMfTix.png (692KB, 540x752px) Image search: [Google]

692KB, 540x752px

>>8398853

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnEKoFrx1rI

>>8398857
That humans didn't evolve from apes.

>>8398853
Artificial genetic intervention

>>8398866
Is it a legit theory though?

Ancient Aryans

File: A1.jpg (191KB, 817x818px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 817x818px

>>8398865
Humans didn't evolve from apes.
Apes and humans evolved from a common ancestor.

>>8398870
at what point does a theory become 'legit'?

Humans evolved from pig chimp hybrid and hybrids are more important than gradual shifts over time

http://www.macroevolution.net/human-origins.html

>>8398885

Humans and apes don't just share a common ancestor, humans ARE apes by definition.

>>8398934
Lazy bait.

>>8398930
Like if it's respected in the biology field.

>>8398885
So basically humans and modern apes evolved from a prehistoric ape. You are arguing semantics here.tomahto tomayto

>>8398950
a couple hundred years ago the "force of life" spontaneously generating shit was respected in the biology field
think for yourself, don't be a sheep

>>8398937
That my good sir, is a straw man fallacy; If ever, I have seen one!

The actual theorem proves that we share common ancestors, but not that we are the same thing. This can be seen by how humans have a higher leer of cognition than apes and other primates.

File: A3.jpg (200KB, 816x819px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 816x819px

>>8398937
You are correct, apologies to you sir/madam.

File: A2.jpg (147KB, 820x817px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 820x817px

>>8398954
Yes, I stand corrected.