What's the most scientific way to cook chicken?

Heat eq.

File: 1456388203235.jpg (33KB, 479x444px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 479x444px

I was going to tell you my method, but then I realized it was "chicken" and not "children". Maybe some other time.

File: swine.gif (983KB, 230x173px) Image search: [Google]

983KB, 230x173px

>steric hindrance

Microwaves

>>8398679
You need to denature its proteins. :^D

>>8398679
Follow the recipe of a professional correctly, just like you do in math to get a result

Aged in a zero-g vacuum chamber

>>8398679
>>8398723
I read that as children too, I've been here too long.

>>8398679
Chemically?

File: 1475807985013.png (213KB, 500x482px) Image search: [Google]

213KB, 500x482px

>those pi bond lengths

What's the most mathematical way to cook chicken?

>>8398679
I'm interested in that too, OP. Not only chicken but food in general. I think chemfags should be really advanced in that.

>>8399343
I don't really think mathematics has any application here.

>>8398679
just cook the chicken according to a predetermined cooking regime and then keep a logbook of actually cooking it and the results.
besure to write a conclusion about your research question or make a recommendation to further research etc.

>>8399489
I guess:

>cook chicken following a recipe
>choose a X characteristic you want to improve/change
>search literature for similar works
>apply the technique on your cooking
>taste to see if things changed for better

For example I had this idea to test variations in sugar concetration and fermentation time of tepache using experimental design while i was learning experimental design. The hardest part is converting the edonic scale of a single person (me) to something reliable. I would get something like using a sugar concetration between 9 and 11% and fermentation time between 24 ad 27 hours gives the optimal result BUT tastes changes every time so my result has little usefulness in real life.