Evolution

>>8396329
There are more details you could insert, eg self - replicating compounds, multinucleate single 'cell' life, etc. But what are you asking exactly? Any list like yours is probably going to come across as bait for an argument.

>>8396422
Mainly just wanted to see if I had a basic understanding of our entire origin.

>>8396329
>organic compounds>[MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF HAND WAVING]>single-celled life

>>8396449
Strange, most people who write it off as hand waving do so before organic compounds or after single-celled. There's very little consensus among those who disagree :(

>>8396458
>>8396449
Unfortunately chirality can only come from biological sources, so most organic compounds are impossible to synthesize without preexisting life.

>>8396472
>Unfortunately chirality can only come from biological sources.
No? There are plenty of non-organic factors that produce chirality, most obviously the earth's rotation itself produces chirality. And once you have an imbalance of chirality it would then be repeatedly selected for further increasing the baalnce.

>>8396542
*imbalance.

You forgot organic compounds in lipid membrane

"This is true of all thirty-two orders of mammals ... The earliest and most primitive known members of every order [of mammals] already have the basic ordinal characters, and in no case is an approximately continuous sequence from one order to another known. In most cases the break is so sharp and the gap so large that the origin of the order is speculative and much disputed ... This regular absence of transitional forms is not confined to mammals, but is an almost universal phenomenon, as has long been noted by paleontologists. It is true of almost all classes of animals, both vertebrate and invertebrate...it is true of the classes, and of the major animal phyla, and it is apparently also true of analogous categories of plants."

"The occurrence of genetic monstrosities by mutation … is well substantiated, but they are such evident freaks that these monsters can be designated only as 'hopeless'. They are so utterly unbalanced that they would not have the slightest chance of escaping elimination through stabilizing selection … the more drastically a mutation affects the phenotype, the more likely it is to reduce fitness. To believe that such a drastic mutation would produce a viable new type, capable of occupying a new adaptive zone, is equivalent to believing in miracles … "

"Take some matter, heat while stirring and wait. That is the modern version of Genesis. The 'fundamental' forces of gravity, electromagnetism and the strong and weak nuclear forces are presumed to have done the rest... But how much of this neat tale is firmly established, and how much remains hopeful speculation? In truth, the mechanism of almost every major step, from chemical precursors up to the first recognizable cells, is the subject of either controversy or complete bewilderment."


http://www.darwinismrefuted.com/short_history_01.html

>>8397301
>darwinismrefuted.com
Yahya, please go.

>>8397301
Umm no.

File: Jesus.jpg (294KB, 1108x788px) Image search: [Google]

294KB, 1108x788px

>>8396329
yeah. that seems about right. (whether or not you believe in me)