Can anyone recommend me textbooks on Astrophysics I can read?
I want to see if I can understand the stuff because I find it really fascinating, and if I can understand it, I may consider going to get meself educated in it.
Canadian in Alberta, if that helps.
I was looking at An Introduction to Modern Astrophysics (2nd Edition) by Dale A. Ostlie and Bradley W. Carroll, but I was wondering if there were other ones I should keep an eye for.
Many thanks. Have picture of cutest actress.
>>8376165
That's definitely the best one in my opinion. If you're really interested in astrophysics I would recommend studying stuff on particle physics and thermodynamics. That stuff is just as essential in astrophysics as SR and GR.
>>8376182
Thermodynamics and Particle Physics, eh?
Sounds good. I was looking at MITOpenCourses.com at some of those things.
Are there any good books on those?
Also, what's a good starting point? Should I start with normal physics before I go into particle physics? I'm assuming it's the same stuff, just on a tiny scale when it comes to Particle Physics(because particles are tiny, yeah?)
>>8376165
http://4chan-science.wikia.com/wiki/Astronomy_Textbook_Recommendations
Choudhuri - Astrophysics for Physicists
>>8376212
oh shit boy. This is great, thank you! Have another Hepburn.
Also, as I said in >>8376196 , is there a recommended starting point? Should I go with physics, then particle physics, then thermodynamics and move on from there?
>>8376216
What's your current math and physics level?
>>8376165
Sweaters and turtlenecks are hot.
>>8376165
What is your background? What math and physics classes have you taken?
I just want to start learnign about astrophyics.
How much basic physic do you need to know?
I forgot most of it from my school years probably, but I'd be able to quickly catch up if it's not rocket science (probably it is though)
>>8376799
You'll probably need Mechanics up to an intermediate level, a decent understanding of special relativity and maybe some proficiency in Electro-Magnetism ( concentrate on the physics behind light ). Astrophysics is a large field and incorporates many branches of physics but those are probably a good start
>>8376799
And if you want a full understanding of the underlying math you'll need at least a full series of analysis (Calc 1-2-3) and diff eq
>>8376799
For Ostlie and Carroll, you'll need freshman Physics I and Calc 1-2 at the bare minimum and preferably Physics II/III and Calc 3/ODEs.