What do?

>>8375717
MULTI TRACK DRIFTING

kill yourself, fuck the rules

Obviously you go towards the black hole . Time will slow down to a crawl at the event horizon ,

>>8375717
Let the trolley go toward the black hole.

The black hole has so much inertia that it could not possibly be moved by the trolley impact (unless the trolley is sufficiently massive and is moving faster than the speed of light).

>>8376171
you can assume it is a FTL trolley

>>8376203
In that case, you would not be able to react. By the time the light reflecting off the trolley reached you, the trolley would have already passed you.

>>8375717
there is only one correct mathematical answer:

+1000c and -1000c equal out to 0c which is fucking cold so fuck that shit, no one wants frozen water cant even drink it jesus

+1000 gravity and -1000 gravity cancel out to 0 gravity, which is scientifically proven to be rad as fuck just look at those cool cats in the ISS

pull the lever, kronk

File: MultiTrackDrifting.jpg (60KB, 500x361px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 500x361px

>>8375717
multi track drift mother fucker

>>8376244
this

File: 1453256656428.jpg (55KB, 448x679px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 448x679px

>>8376244
dude that was fucking brilliant

How does the black hole even approach the white hole without getting pushed away

>>8376353
Since the Predictor is gone, look inside the box.

If there are people under the box, then the Predictor must have concluded that you would leave the switch alone. Now, switch the track. Since the Predictor has never predicted incorrectly, it must be that he concluded that you would flip the switch. Therefore, the five people that appear to be under the box aren't actually there. So really, you should just leave the switch alone, and you will not kill anybody.

Now, if there are no people under the box, then the Predictor must have concluded that you would flip the switch. So you leave the switch alone. But the Predictor must have predicted that would leave the switch alone. Therefore, there are actually 5 people under the box, even if there appears to be none. Thus, you should flip the switch to kill the maximum number of people.

>>8376353
the predictor decides whether or not to put people into the box prior to the moment that I make my decision, thus in the moment that I make the decision they are already either there or not there regardless of what I choose
the paradox comes in because if I change my answer to hit the switch then we can assume that it would've predicted this as well, but I tend to think this won't change anything given that it's already drawn its conclusion prior to me making my decision, which would mean that if in that moment I foresaw the predictor correctly guessing my decision and attempted to counter it by doing the opposite I would kill all six people
the only way I could be sure to kill only one person is by having concluded beforehand that I would prefer to knowingly kill one person rather than risk killing 5 so that I could be sure that they aren't there