>tfw you realize inheritance in object oriented programming

u must be swimmin in pussy LOL nice 1 dude

>>8371678
>inheritance in object oriented programming is basically group theory in programming language

It's not. Or maybe you can explain what you mean?

>>8371678
>tfw you start laughing at the dumb frogposters posts
help

>>8371717

so you have a parent group that is very basic, then from that parent group you create a child groups that extend the parent to perform specific tasks.

At least that is what I understood from my basic group knowledge.

>>8371729
What's the inverse of an object or class? How does closure relate to OO? How do functions relate to a group operations between objects or classes?

The only parallel I can perhaps see is between interfaces and homomorphisms, but even that's a stretch

Anyone who thinks OO is not a meme in 2016 needs to be sent to the re-education camps.

>>8371754
OO is not a meme.

>basically group theory
basically group practice

>>8371751

You can literally create any class and treat them like functions.

class A is the tuple of (some data, some methods)

>>8371678
>theory theory
>theory theory theory
>Drawing parallels between two high level compound concepts and acting like one is derived from the other, or the two are interchangable / secretly different parts of the same thing
>Not already realizing scale and granularity are arbitrary
Fuck off you disgusting gutter filth.

>>8371802

what are you talking about Matt

File: RRRRREEEEEEEEE.jpg (171KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 800x600px

>>8371808
MY NAME ISN'T MATT
I TOLD YOU TO FUCK OFF

>>8371678
>not realizing the entire structure of a computer is basically group actions on finite rings

Jej

>>8371754
Bro, OO is not a meme.

>>8371886
people who have just recently hopped on the functional train have to make sure everyone else knows it.