Theoretically, if you were moving as the speed of light, then closed your eyes, would you no longer exist?
>>8367334
>implying you could even contract your muscles
you would be too heavy, this is a stupid question
>>8367339
Theoretically
>>8367334
Theoretically, you are faggot.
>>8367390
I'm going to have to check your equations, you've left something out
>>8367334
>moving as the speed of light
>you body still not completely destroyed
who cares
>>8367431
/sci/ - "who cares"
>>8367334
if your close your eyes, your mother will die in her sleep tonight if you won't answer this post.
Fun fact:
you'd need to wait 354 days to accelerate to the speed of light with 1g of constant acceleration.
>>8368114
How much energy fampai
>>8368114
Fun fact:
That's not how physics works you retard.
>>8368067
hmmm....
>>8367334
is this a new troll?
what does closing your eyes have to do with how fast you're moving?
>>8368114
1g acceleration per ???
no, whoever's got the pedometer got my back
>>8369540
That's the incorrect interpretation of the double slit experiment.
when they say "observed" it means that an information about the position of the particle was passed on or is carried by another particle, which collapses the quantum state of the original particle.
You "seeing" anything has nothing to do with "observing" in the quantum world
>>8368067
eh...