Entanglement across time

just a baby to quantum physics, but if i had to guess, i'd say that IF it happens, it only happens on a VERY small scale, on the order of nanoseconds or smaller
bumping because i'm also interested

>>8346423
Yep, it's been done a number of times and is one of the main mechanisms behind quantum information.

What's that drawing supposed to be?

>>8346618
This is interesting, How would you do such an experiment? I though you need immediate access to both particles you are trying to entangle. so how can you entangle one with the other before you entangle to other at all?

>>8346776
Yeah that's how you entangle particles. First they need to be in contact with each other to interact, then you can separate them and observe the weird stuff.

>>8346776
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ORLN_KwAgs

>>8346833
>observe the weird stuff

for you

t. Hominidae

>>8346423
>What's that drawing supposed to be?
Believe this if you want or not, but I have experienced little snippets from the future.

The drawing represents a memory I experienced on 7-2-2016 that happened on 7-4-2016. They are always very quick and unpredictable. Never nothing of importance really. The most important one was a memory of indecisiveness of whether to go right or left at a a stop sign. When it really happened I ended up going right and getting into a fender bender.

Anyway I don't believe in divine influence or anything, so given that the experiences are real I was trying to find a scientific explanation for them. The best I can come up with is some little particles in my brain that make up my memory are being entangled with themselves a few days into the future. Actually it may not even be memory, because the experiences are very real. I can see and feel what is happening to me. They happen between dreams.

>>8348288
That's not how it works. You can't transmit information with entanglement. What you're doing isn't looking for something scientific, you just want a nice sounding word to slap onto your supernatural belief. Saying "entanglement" without understanding how entanglement works has as much value as saying "magic".

>>8346618
>>8346834
fuck you popsci fag
http://arxiv.org/abs/1112.4522

>>>/x/

>>8346611
Do you know enough about quantum mechanics to say that 4th dimentional structures collapse due to long term instability? It could easily work across millennia.

>>8346423
Yes. google it.
BUT you still can send information faster than the speed of light.

>>8349824
Damn it... NOT faster than speed of light.