>He thinks he can reach human-level AI by 2019 will he do it bros?

serious question: what the fuck is human level ai

>>8340698
We want to make our computers dumber so that our computers also need to invent computers so that they can do simple calculations like the prime factorization of 348398293982.

But obviously, we want our computers to also take 100 thousand years to build their computer-computers.

Or at least that is what I think. That is literally human level intelligence.

In other words: OP is retarded.

>>8340710
That post made no sense. Gtfo.

>>8340768
OP is talking about human level AI right?

Well, that is human level intelligence. Literally

>inb4 muh sungooolareeeteee memes

>OP thinks making the same thread over and over again is a good idea

will he kill himself bros?

>>8340694
No

>>8340775
>intelligence developing with complete access to all the knowledge of humanity would develop as quickly as humans that had to figure everything out on their own
I hope for your sake you're only pretending to be this retarded

>>8340698

It's like normal AI but dumber.

>>8340694
That's a fairly probably date.

Honestly I wouldn't be surprised if it was within 5 years.

>>8340982
How do you figure?

>>8340983
Because it's not that complicated. A lot of the human brain is dedicated to non-abstract thinking. Such as controlling the human body's motion and calculating movement.

Think of the difference between a chimp brain and human brain. It's not that large but we have very different abilities to problem solve and pattern match.

If you have the immense amount of money and top talent on the problem such that exists now in AI. It's only a matter of time.

>>8340694
who is this guy? what's his field of research?

>>8340694
>the more stagnant AI becomes the grander AI researchers claim become
lamo
come back when you can make robots that don't spill their spaghettis all over the place

>>8340989

ok, I'm back
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVlhMGQgDkY

AI has advanced more in the last 5 years than the last 50 before it

>>8340988
It's actually pathetic to be on /sci/ and not know
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demis_Hassabis

>>8340698
It's just more meaningless pop-sci buzzwords.

>>8340989
you are fundamentally stupid and obviously low IQ to make such a statement.

There is zero link between replicating biological muscles and creating artificial intelligence.

You seem to be retarded to think that somehow "intelligence" is related to walking like a human. See: dolphins and octopus.

You basically are so stupid that you think watching a robot walk around is somehow important to AI.

>>8340992
Human level implies general intelligence that can adapt to new situations and problems while applying lessons learned on different problem sets.

It basically means you can ask it to learn to drive and it will adapt and learn to drive with minimal inputs.

It doesn't mean it will have a personality, motivations, or things like that though.

>>8340990
The number of "2s" in the current year has increased more in the last 17 years than in the 100 years prior.

>>8341012
Geoff Hinton said it, my autistic friend

>>8341012
>lol nothing's real :^)

Www Lld

>>8341012
The AI field is just lying to everyone. CERN is an evil athiest plot.

File: 1470145027887.png (92KB, 471x480px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 471x480px

>>8340990
>when he's moving that box away from him and he's hopelessly trying to get it back

too kawaii 4 me

>>8340698
There are still a lot of things humans can do that AI can't.
Like watch a video and give a brief description of it.

>>8341077
>Like watch a video and give a brief description of it.

Geoff Hinton expects that by 2020

>>8340694

>He thinks he can reach human-level AI by 2019

source? I thought he said within ten years in 2014-2015.

>>8341103

Yeah I'm bullshitting, every time I make this thread I lower the date by a few years just to piss people off. What he really said was (I'm paraphrasing) "By 2030, we think we'll have solved AI for everything. And we think we'll be able to scale it up to superintelligence shortly after".

>>>8340698
>It's just more meaningless pop-sci buzzwords.

You just revealed how little you know about AI.