Is it possible to recover from brain death? If yes, would the

>>8335541
No. Simply not possible.

Poor Dick, years haven't been kind to him.

File: CRISPR.jpg (32KB, 320x255px)

32KB, 320x255px

>>8335544

not yet :^)

>>8335541
This could be possible since your neurones aren't destroyed when you die. Your body just isn't capable of supporting it anymore

>>8335541
>"reseted"

4chan needs a grammar board

>>8336326
>>>/lit/

>>8335541
>Is it possible to recover from brain death?

Would there be continuity of consciousness?

If not, then you are back to the old philosophical questions about the Star Trek Fax Machine transporter.

>>8335541
>recover from brain death
sure, happens all the time.
you're a 4chan shitposter after that tho

>>8338039
kek

>>8335541
Presently I'm fairly sure no, though how much that's just because by definition brain death is a permanent cessation of brain activity I'm not sure.

If brain death is defined as permanent cessation of brain activity then no, you can't recover from it.

What classifies as dead though keeps getting pushed back further and further via medical advances in saving nearly dead people.

This begs the question: does being dead simply mean we're unable to revive someone?

>>8335561
> implying CRISPR will make a difference
do you want to revive your grandma or something?

brain death means your brain is dead i.e. dead dead so no.

File: 1473198135899.jpg (111KB, 794x860px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 794x860px

>>8338857
>map your genome at 20 years of age
>CRISPR your genome back to when you were 20 at the age of 70

What could go wrong?

>>8335552
I wonder if he'll reconsider his stance on God as he nears death.

Pascal's wager and all.

>>8339301
>Pascal's wager
Is pretty retarded since it can be used equally well against every position

>>8335541
only a healthy brain can be resetted e.g. using ultrasonic