What experiment would prove/disprove that race is more than

>>8318600

statistics

>>8318600
gallup poll

>>8318600
None because for race to not exist every human would have to look exactly the same.

IQ

Piece of cake:

http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/v36/n11s/full/ng1435.html

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982205002095

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369848613000460

http://science.sciencemag.org/content/298/5602/2381.full

http://www.nature.com/index.html?file=/ng/journal/v36/n11s/full/ng1455.html

http://www.pnas.org/content/94/9/4516.full

http://genome.cshlp.org/content/14/9/1679.full

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v526/n7571/full/nature15393.html

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tan.12165/abstract

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2271140/

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002929707610015

Does anyone have reputable journals to the contrary?

>>8318672
huffpost says you need to go back to pol faggot

>>8318600
Looking at their skin color.
Dumb frog poster.

>>8318676
>papers arguing that races as commonly understood don't actually exist in humans (despite genetic variation) belong in /pol/
it's an abstract kind of meme

I am confused, all of these are articles show that race is merely a social construct, but more importantly are useless on a genetic level. I doubt /pol/ would be very accepting of me..

>>8318600
Gender

>>8318600
>What experiment would prove/disprove that race is more than a social construct?
If by "race" you mean "genetic diversity", then, yeah, any genetic difference between any two individuals, even siblings, would do.
But "race is a social construct" is meant to indicate that the groups we divide the human race into are relatively arbitrary.
Are Jews white? Indians? Both are Caucasians.
How many sub-Saharan races are there? One, Five?
You decide!

..and that's why "race is a social construct".

>>8318922
>How many sub-Saharan races are there?
Who gives a shit about those negroes?