Intelligence

>>8293587
btw I know that there's already this one but I think it's similar and not the same question there.
Plus asking another question in a thread wouldn't get me any answer.

> regardless of IQ which is still proven inaccurate

It's one of the most tested, statistically reliable and valid concepts in the social sciences.

Come on.

File: 1471845459669.jpg (13KB, 540x489px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 540x489px

>>8293973

>one of the most tested, statistically reliable
>social sciences.

That's not really much of an accomplishment considering the field as a whole.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/03/09/does-social-science-have-a-replication-crisis/

http://science.sciencemag.org/content/349/6251/aac4716

http://andrewgelman.com/2011/09/10/the-statistical-significance-filter/

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis

http://www.nature.com/news/over-half-of-psychology-studies-fail-reproducibility-test-1.18248

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4436798/

>>8293973
>social sciences

Lmao

>>8294013
Social sciences are shit because they're politicized and there is no quantifiable measure of human irrationality. As such it's impossible to predict what will happen with the economy with its millions of variables. People in psychology are also blinded by their own irrational political bias.

low IQ thread

>>8293709
>Do we have the same power of thinking as another human being ?

We do all think by the same rules, but not by in the same speed. That's what makes the biggest difference. Of course, if a field routinely requires complex thoughts, someone with a a "slow brain" just won't be able to keep up more often than not, and thus be branded "unsuited". But evidently, it's just a relative measure.

I think it's a matter of neural plasiticity primarily, and secondarily of neuron density. If you up these two factors, you can make anyone into von Neumann. Conversely, if you "slow down" the task, i.e. employ a different teaching methology, you can teach almost anything to anyone. I think as a society we have to work on both.

File: einstein-hiroshima-bg.jpg (9KB, 200x160px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 200x160px

intelligence was a mistake

how do we cure it?

>>8294126
Yep. This is why all the "race scientists" like Jensen, Rushton, Nyborg, Lynn, and Stapel are all professors of psychology.. not genetics.

>>8293709
>My question is : Are we as equal before knowledge ? Do we have the same power of thinking as another human being ? Are we all able of understanding logic ?
>Do you think that ultimately, regardless of social classes, diet, education, discipline, teacher and the will to learn, we can all reason equally ?
I think we do
afterall we are all more or less on similar tiers with small minorities at each end of the spectrum
obviously there are different ways in which we process information though so the key for reasoning with eachother is to find the best ways to convey logic