My roommate believes this...

But it says scientists discovered it

I read we might've even seen the fields before like, we had some special cones in our eyes or something that detected them but yeah. It's all lost now anyways.

>>8286901
>-6th-sense

Ameritard educated blogger spotted.

Thermoception
Magnetoreception
Equilibrioception
Nociception
Chronoception
Proprioception
Peripheral chemoreceptors
Satiety
Hunger
Pulmonary stretch receptors
Cutaneous receptors
Chemoreceptors

>>8286922
tfw feeling covers most of these

chronological perceptivity is probably the closest we'll come to an idea of extrasensory modes of consciousness

So can anyone give me something specific to destroy this with?

>>8286952
Am I to understand that you're currently in a debate about this somewhere, and you're outsourcing your internet-argument research to us?

>>8286968
Well my roommate is very stupid, thinks he's smart, only looks up crack pot shit like this, and always acts offended when I tell him it's bullshit. So all that to say yes lol. And I'm trying to get him to at least get on good forums so other people can berate him and maybe he'll learn something.

>>8286901
Didn't Rupert Sheldrake work on something like that? Morphic field he called it, IIRC.

There is a very, very weak ability for humans to sense polarized light. This might be related to that.

>>8286986

>he's really stupid
>but I can't disprove his stupid bullshit on my own, I need help

Really makes you think...

I'm think that if you put a person in between 2 huge electric magnets he will definetely feel something.
Maybe he will even feel something for the rest of his life.

>>8286934
incorrect, use google next time before shitposting your brainlet output

>>8286901
humans only have one sense and it's touch.

>>8286901

My dad is able to use his wedding ring to detect AC current through walls. It isn't that amazing.

>>8289581
/sci/ only has one sense and it's nonsense.