Hello /sci/, /x/ here. This poster >>>/x/18042942 is claiming he can use euler's formula to prove that anti-matter has an "inverse time component" meaning that it moves backwards in time. I have the suspicion that he is full of shit but I would appreciate it if anybody could look over it and tell me.
>>8283316
if you can't even tell if its nonsense or not, you should be reading up on background materials
He's right
but he didn't discover it, it's just a well known fact
>>8283330
So antimatter does travel backwards in time relative to everything else?
>>8283332
yes
>>8283333
nspooky(n+2)me
>>8283333
>trolling /x/ posters
Kek. Don't listen to this guy, OP. Things can't move backward in time. That's obviously bullshit.
Nice quads though.
>>8283342
>Things can't move backward in time. That's obviously bullshit.
>>8283335
n =2
>>8283316
Well, he does make a mistake in the last set of calculations, kx-wt becomes kx(-wt).
>>8285422
Since you're the only one who isn't baiting could you put what he's saying in plain English? Or what it means for the values to conjugate in respect to the real axis?
>>8283316
Opposite currents dont flow backwards in time they just flow backwards. Period.
>>8283316
OP anything that comes out of /x/ is guaranteed to be bullshit just disregard him.
>>8285742
Thank you, that's all I wanted to know.