What is it?
>>8281823
>if I use unclear notation I can create an entire thread full of bickering!
>>8281833
Nothing about he notation is unclear. People just forget to do the multiplication/division from left to right as the order of operations says. Answer is 9.
>>8281839
>garaunteed replies
Its 9 obviously. I can't get why some people get this wrong.
>>8281823
6/2(1+2)
= 6/2*(3)
= 6/6
= 1
>>8281839
What's written in the picture has no mathematical meaning.
It's like asking for the definition of "ayewfgoayfedna97w".
>>8281854
>the numerals have no meaning
>the division sign has no meaning
>the parenthesis have no meaning
>the equals sign has no meaning
>the implied multiplication sign has no meaning
>>8281848
wrong
6/2(1+2)
= 6/2*3
= 3/6
= 9
>>8281860
>3/6
I meant 3*3
>>8281855
The individual things have meanings on their own. There is no meaning when they are combined in certain ways, such as how it was done in the picture.
>>8281848
Why are you multiplying before you divide? Why do you think a multiplication somehow takes preference?
>>8281870
i acknowledge i was being presumptuous and multiplication shouldn't take preference. the answer is definitely 9
>>8281869
>what is an equation
>>8281823
>What is it?
An ambiguous use of notation.
>>8281880
Except there's no convention such as "distribution precedes multiplication". Not ambigious. Compute parenthesis, then left to right (=9).
There is no good answer.
>>8281886
There is no "left to right" order, the notation used in OP is unclear, end of story
>inb4 falling fir the b8
>>8281860
>3/6 = 9
>>8281823
the answer is 9, nothing is unclear you're all just fucking brain damaged
>>8281890
MATHEMATICIANS BTFO THEIR LIFE HAS BEEN A LIE
>>8281902
>you're all just fucking brain damaged
The only guy who said anything other than 9 changed his mind, who are you referring to
>>8281903
But that's fucking wrong anon
>>8281905
They're on suicide watch for sure.
>>8281823
valid single line notation, result is 9.