Now that the dust has settled, who was right?

friedman

File: walter white.jpg (5KB, 248x280px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 248x280px

Both are statists

File: xeFHyag.jpg (26KB, 680x583px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 680x583px

>>8275887
>economics
>science
FUCK OFF WITH YOUR MEME SCIENCE PSEUDOACADEMIC TRASH THEY WERE BOTH WRONG

>>8276069
>the only thing able to explain anything in the world is hard science
Spotted the physics major

File: 8FaAqMG.png (937KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

937KB, 900x900px

>>8276077
IM A THEORETICAL MATHEMATICIAN IM FAMILIAR WITH THEIR WORK NO SCIENTIFIC METHOD NO EXPERIMENTS NO PROOFS BABY TIER MATHEMATICS 90 PERCENT CONJECTURE ECONOMICS IS GARBAGE
G
A
R
B
A
G
E

>>8276099
Nobody is going to take you seriously in academia, if you are willing to insist on this kind of attitude.

I am not familiar with the field that much, but I kind of understand how it could be hard and interesting. Human behaviour is really complex, It's probably hard to create a consistent model.

considering 99% of respected modern economists are some form of keynesian ill go with keynes..

Keynes

>>8275887
neither.

>>8275887
Friedman. By a large margin.

Uhh are they mutually exclusive? Does one of them ignore violence or something like that?

How long before this is a liberal vs conservative debate?