Chinese Satellite with Quantum encryption

>>8275610
>'hack-proof'
hah

I havent hacked it yet, maybe its really hack proof...

Maybe it has quantum eavesdropping detection but I'm not sure how that could work in a satellite.

>>8275610
>slap the word "quantum" in front of a phrase
>???
>profit
Don't reply to me, this is a Quantum™ Post

>>8275793
It's only quantum until replied to. I have collapsed your post.

File: 1467547005086.jpg (15KB, 270x200px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 270x200px

>>8276145
not according to the decoherence theory

>>8275793
your retard

>>8275610
It'll be hacked within the week.

>>8275612
"Hack proof". Quantum communication uses quantum intanglement. No EM waves. The communication is hack proof, not the satellite. This isn't encryption.

File: 14713751557040.webm (1MB, 406x720px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 406x720px

Hey guys I have two questions for you:
1. How do you store your photon? Does a photon stay entangled when it's absorbed or reflected?
2. Can you formulate entanglement through path integrals?

File: 1471441497339.jpg (39KB, 336x265px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 336x265px

>>8276427
>How do you store your photon? Does a photon stay entangled when it's absorbed or reflected?

The Chinese claim they've trapped photons in a photon crystal created in a laser matrix, and that it does indeed remain entangled after perturbation sufficient for signalling. Pretty crazy considering this is exactly what all the classical physicists, Hawking included, predicted was necessarily impossible.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/17/world/asia/china-quantum-satellite-mozi.html?_r=0

File: 45-maxresdefault.jpg (25KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 1280x720px

I empathize.

if it works, it's going to turn all of physics on its head, so i think it will almost certainly fail.

OK, is that bullshit due to editorialization, or bullshit due to actually believing in quantum communications?

>>8275612
>>8276246
>build "hack-proof" satellite that uses fucking entanglement for encrypted communications
>it's not missile-proof