How do we stop heat death, /sci/?

>>8274147
this is a question that actually bothers me

of all things I fucking hate entropy, fuck that shit. gives me actual nightmares.

>>8274147
INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR MEANINGFUL ANSWER.

move to a new universe once this one is dead

we should be able to figure out how to
do that by then

>>8274147

Why dont you focus on getting a job and your own place first? Kek

>>8274147
You can't. Actors inside the simulation cannot alter fundamental properties of the simulation itself.

>>8274147
With heat life, of course.

>>8274159
The only legitimate response

once we get fusion down it wont matter.

>>8274216
That doesnt make any kind of sense

>>8274147
Fuck all of these NOOB answers. Obviously we'll just say fuck this universe and go to a new one. Or create our own with blackjack and hookers

>>8274217
"oh no all the atoms are being ripped apart form the inside"

"natural laws no longer allow starts to produce fusion"

"it is our job now to fuse atoms and quarks together"


I don't know alot about fusion.

File: CCzgaKNUkAEeX2Q.jpg (74KB, 1023x712px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 1023x712px

>>8274147
>implying we even know what causes heat

>>8274147
We don't. We just invent perfect reversible computation. Thermodynamics says computers that don't delete anything can run forever without expending any energy or generating entropy. Of course because we can't delete anything and the space to store data is limited there can only be a limited number of 'thoughts'.