Is he right?

>chopra
>right ever

i don't understand is he saying that "natural laws are ephemeral and don't appear in reality but must be inferred"? I mean the laws of thermo-dynamics is evident in every fireworks display. Is he saying thought is a transcendent realm where we the truth of the universe is expressed cause if so that sound like a lot of circle logic. "We know truth is vast because its entirety is incomprehensible" My example of a notion that has no meaning or value but might look good in a fortune cookie.

File: Andres-Roemer-Richard-Dawkins_MILIMA20131109_0526_11[1].jpg (26KB, 478x324px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 478x324px

I didn't know how retarded Derpack until I saw this video and got exposed to his infinite pit of autism

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BiwLrxPb1fE

>>8255500
>intelligence
>consciousness
>quantum something something
He sounds like your average /sci/ poster.

File: image.jpg (38KB, 394x391px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 394x391px

>Perceivable reality is not a part of perceivable reality, it is an abstract model built upon human perception that exists outside of human perception and which creates and governs perceivable reality.

>>8255494
>i don't understand is he saying that "natural laws are ephemeral and don't appear in reality but must be inferred"?

No, I believe he's saying that we know how these laws work and their consequences, but we don't know why the laws are the way they are. A mathematical platonist might say that the universe is mathematical in nature, and it follows mathematical principles, which are abstract and don't find themselves in our universe.

File: cop.jpg (30KB, 306x560px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 306x560px

>>8255469
Nope

>>8255480
that's besides the point, millions of idiots fawn over this guy because he uses big words and has branded himself as an indian 'spiritual guru'
>>8255525
modest kek

>>8255469
That faggot is hindu as fuck - very religious and irrational.
>>8255500

For me it was this interview.

>>8255579

>he's saying that we know how these laws work and their consequences, but we don't know why the laws are the way they are

And then he adds quantum consciousness, knowing from within and the spiritual nature of that transcendent realm; you know, whence the essence of God flows.

He's a master of wu wu.

nihilism is just plain simpler then all this
>>8255579
Thank You this makes more sense then what i was thinking, but isn't this similar to the gap between quantum mechanics and general relativity? (i need to put it in layman's terms because i am lameAss) just to make sure i understand "laws are evident by experience but how they became structured in the first place is the Cosmic why"? or is the why more then just the how?
>>8255500
sorry couldn't watch it all the way through Chopra gave a politician's answer for the 1st question about belief just saying belief is a reaction of instinct and then inserting the topic of cosmic "purpose"