Puzzlessss
>>8211888
lit buld has insignificantly more mass but significantly less weight
>>8211899
if by weight then is the heated one
>>8211899
if the inside is not a vacuum the heated bulb weighs less due to buoyancy
>>8211904
>lit buld has insignificantly more mass but significantly less weight
>>8211926
>if by weight then is the heated one
Either of you niggers want to explain your ideas?
Personally, I think the heated bulb should get slightly larger, but still have the same mass, so it's slightly more buoyant in air, but not actually lighter.
Also...
>>8211904
>lit buld has insignificantly more mass but significantly less weight
Are you implying gravity itself has changed?
Weight IS mass * gravity, or am I missing something?
>>8211938
a lit buld is hot, there is an electrical current passing through the wire both of which carries some energy, thermal or electric, and we all know that E = mc^2, so it adds a few attograms
but the buld also expands a little due to heat (whether it has an inert gas inside or near-vacuum) taking up more volume and experiecing a greater buoyant force in the surrounding air, this adds up to a few nano- or microgramms and could actually be measured
>>8211982
>we all know that E = mc^2, so it adds a few attograms
Attograms seems likely to be smaller than some other incidental effects like outgassing, or something else I can't be bothered to think of,
>greater buoyant force in the surrounding air
Being more buoyant doesn't actually make something weigh less.
>>8211938
ez
>>8211899
they both weight the same
also who the fuck is gonna care how much a lit bulb weighs anyway?
>>8213329
>believing solids don't expand at all when heated
>>8214102
Ice doesn't.
>>8214392
Nice one! You got me! I should have been more concise and said:
>believing no solids expand when heated
>>8214055
GOOD DOOD DOD GOD DOD DOOOOD