I have a simple question (simple for you who know math).
How do I calculate how many relatives I would have if:
all descendant of the first, including himself (let's call him adam) had 3 kids each, and each of these had 3 kids too, and so on...
10 generations back
>>8179095
3^10+1. Or am I stupid ?
>>8179101
I think that's the last generation, and off by one, so, 3^9 + 3^8 + ... + 3^0.
>>8179095
>The Nobel Prize is a set of annual international awards bestowed in a number of categories by Swedish and Norwegian committees in recognition of academic, cultural and/or scientific advances.
>Swedish and Norwegian committees
that explains the map
>>8179095
Damn, the middle east doing great with their scientific progress. Just one year after the caliphate of europe is founded and they are already literally beating everyone else in science.
The toughest question is why the caliphate of north america is not doing as well as their european counterparts?
>>8179121
88573. Your welcome.
>>8179121
you just plug that into your calculator faggot
>>8179110
They don't nominate people out of the blue. They ask working scientists and universities. And guess who has most influence among these? Circlejerking American universities.
>>8179173
np bro
>>8179144
>88573
I just wanted to say "Hi!" to cleo.
>>8179121
Man I wish there existed some notation for summing numbers and that calculators for such nation could be easily accessed online.
>>8179095
It depends. For example in a family as inbred as yours, the exact value would be exponentially smaller than what you would expect.
>>8180541
That's true of every family tree. If you had no repeats in your family tree you'd only have to go back like 33 generations to reach 10 billion.
>>8179095
Exponents anon