1,5,17,48,122... what is the next number?
who knows
290
Any fucking number you want. Literally any number.
Kill yourself.
>>8161457
p-pi?
ITT people can't find rule
>mad
365
After 290 comes 659
>>8161513
After 290 comes 291, fucking retard
>>8161560
I keked
>>8161492
This.
You could just say the pattern is the zeroes of (x-1)(x-5)(x-17)(x-48)(x-122)(x-n) with n being the desired next number
>>8161784
Nope
Here's a clue.
Think about Fibonacci sequences.
>ITT <90iq
>>8161492
>Any fucking number you want. Literally any number.
>Kill yourself.
This.
Underconstrained problems are daily threads woo.
>>8161457
[math]p(x)=-\frac{3313}{1440}x^5+\frac{3365}{96}x^4-\frac{57353}{288}x^3+\frac{50843}{96}x^2-\frac{464621}{720}x+\frac{3397}{12}[/math]
p(0)=1
p(1)=5
p(2)=17
and so on
>>8161457
348
>>8162362
No, you're wrong.
>>8162378
it's 651
>>8162362
He literally just showed you how it could be any number at all. Mcfucking kill yourself dude
>>8162375
This is the right answer.
>>8161492
What kind of brainlet would be averse to pattern recognition? Of course it can be anything, but what's the simplest pattern?
>>8161478
I get 289
>>8162375
3397/12 != 1
obvious bait
>>8162375
>p(1)=1
>p(2)=5
>p(3)=17
fixed
>>8162755
"Simplest" is subjective, you fucking brainlet.
>>8162820
Not really, we all have a similar vague idea what it means.
It'll be 1 again. The sequence repeats after 122. Prove me wrong
266 given the input examples
>>8163110
You're being disingenuous.
>>8163287
I find 0.111111... repeating simpler than pi for the same reason. What is hard to believe about finding this sequence to be the simplest?
>>8161457
If this is continuous, it's definitely an exponential sequence.
Some form of a*2^x+b
>>8162375
How did you get to that solution?
>>8163400
he's OP
and he's a fag
>>8161457
Look up Lagrange interpolation.
>>8161457
Easy: number of times I've doggystyled your mom lmao
>>8161457
-1/12