ITT: shit that makes you lose hope in humanity

>>8099742

People who complain about things that make them lose hope in humanity.

>>8099742
Contrarian hypocrites who act like they don't like to complain about things that make them lose hope in humanity.

Humanity.

Right wing, left wing, chicken wing. It's built on finding the easier ways through.

>>/sci/catalog

>>8099742
basically stupid consumers. ..which i am in part, let's be real.

but i mean people that legit don't care about the big picture, they openly don't care what they consume and what they 'vote for with their wallets' and what the implication of that would be.
kinda.. deliberate stupidity. animal behavior. which, i mean, we are animals, so who am i to complain, right?! but c'mon people

File: Oldman14.png (47KB, 347x263px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 347x263px

>>8099812
CAPITALIZE... MAN!

unintelligent people having an influence on anything

also, people who think that unintelligent people should have an influence on anything

if there was just one country that required an IQ of greater than 110 to be a citizen, I would move there and have hope for humanity.

>>8099825
which episode is that from?

also, wouldn't you agree?

>>8099837
oh no. you want to build a wall and make the world great again, don't you?

>>8099837
IQ is not directly related to inteligence m8

the reality that is 2016

>>8099837
>IQ of greater than 110
brainlet detected

>>8099845
of course. Anyone who doesn't is cucked by ideology

>>8099856
this is just objectively wrong. Even if it was true, I don't give a shit. It's good enough.

>>8099867
if we set the cutoff to 130 or something , there wouldn't be enough people, and there would be almost no women.

>>8099868
who's gonna do the shitty jobs in your country?

>>8099833
i am copypasting your answers

>>8099879
robots.

the ones that can't yet be done by robots will be done by the people who are contributing the least to other fields.

>>8099884
dream on!

we need 2 things: the richest fucks distributing some of their money so that people are less on edge and get paid well for hard work. I'm talking teachers, nurses, people in nursing homes, sewer workers or trashmen. jobs that are just shit, but we really depend on, needs to get payed more.
otherwise, vote with your vallet. lobbyism is fucking shit. it's not what you want! so don't let get away with it.
they wouldn't do it, if it didn't pay. so don't pay for it.

if that got done, trust me, we wouldn't give a shit about the remaining stupidity

>>8099923
yeah we would


the problem with your solution is that money would then go to the least qualified, who would then breed at a higher rate than the most qualified.

your solution would make everything worse.

Christianity for bringing American science down. Huckabee, Palin, Santorum and Falwell, along with anybody who identifies in the Tea Party needs to be deported to Madagascar or Cambodia

>>8099742
big bang theory. fuck that cryptochristocrap

>>8099976
what's your theory then?

>>8099978
this one seems legit:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.0354

>feminism
>social justice warriors
>black lives matter
>islam
>brainlets

>>8099742
Meat and animal cruelty, unrelated to /sci/ though

>>8099742
Edgy faggots who have never done anything in their life who choose to whine about other people instead of doing something.

Whenever someone says the infinite monkey theorem guarantees the existence of the works of shakespeare will be produced.

>>8099742
People with no knowledge in math and physics whining about "obvious" flaws in incredibly advanced topics without more than a superficial glimpse of the subject.

>>8100085
Irrelevant tautologies about infinity that say absolutely nothing about the real world are fun.

Here's a counterargument for next time someone tells you that: did you know that if you had infinite strings, an infinite subset of them say "fuck you"? Another infinite subset equal the contents of your favorite religious text. Really makes you wonder doesn't it.

>>8099742

When you realize a world without religion/dogma simply cannot exist. And the tribalism it promotes won't go away.

>>8100092

This

Also, /lit/

I have met thousands upon thousands of people and no one I have met who claimed to be /lit/ was smart or inclined mathematically

>>8099742
>ITT: shit that makes you lose hope in humanity
My wife.

>>8100113
>tribalism
>bad
>religion for the purpose of social and cultural cohesion
>bad
Nice meme lad; the day humanity successfully fosters an atheistic/anthropocentric religion, is the day that humanity becomes great.

>>8099856
>IQ is not directly related to inteligence m8
>>8099868
>this is just objectively wrong. Even if it was true, I don't give a shit. It's good enough.

Can you guys agree that IQ is related to actual intelligence and test-taking ability?
If so, sign me up for 110-land.
Do you have a flag picked out yet, or can I design one?

>>8099882
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_banana_cultivars#AA_Group

What is your fucking problem?

>>8099940
>money would then go to the least qualified, who would then breed at a higher rate
>implying poor people breed less now

>>8100148
>implying manual laborers are dumber because they don't pursue academia
>implying manual labor is net worse than leaving your children with half a million in debt.

when will this meme die?

>>8099812
i think a good portion of people in the first world act like animals and we would be benefited if some gene therapy were released that could improve intelligence in the living

>>8099871
>if we set the cutoff to 130 or something , there wouldn't be enough people, and there would be almost no women.
I'd heard the 4chins make you gay, but I always thought it was /b/, not /sci/.

>>8100145
He's the douche that thinks replying randomly with copy and paste means something.

He doesn't understand how logic works.

He went on for 3 months copypasta'ing my corrections of his uses of fallacies.

He does this all the time.

Ignore him.

>>8100162
I'll never last 3 months on here. Ive been here three hours and I already wanna kill myself to reduce the amount of sub 130 IQ individuals in the population.

>at least then /sci/ might love me and not call me a retard ;_;

>>8100165
lol Richard Feynman had an IQ of 125 but is one of the most important modern physicists

File: 1445517253114.jpg (20KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 480x480px

>>8100167
>tfw no illusion I'll ever have his tenacity

I like his funny autobiostories though. "Surely you're joking, Mister Feynman" for instance.

Had me buckling over when he was assumed "a genius" because he was a fucking trickster who would learn every code combination for all the archive drawers at Alamo to make it seem like he was some awesome safecracker.

>his face when he was called to help some government muckmuck crack an actual safe

>>8100165
>Not realizing that 99% of /sci/ took an online quiz that reported 135 like they all do
They're idiots anon.

>>8100165
>>8100173
>iq
>serious

>>8100173
But they're such angry idiots! I honestly have no problem realizing I'm a verifiable idiot if that were indeed the case. I just don't see why such a hostile environment is necessary.

>fucking worse than the robots.

>>8100182
You can find angry hordes of idiots everywhere. It's the human condition. Stop worrying about the opinions of immature idiots. Form an opinion of yourself, and find what you want to improve at. Anything else is running in circles feeling sorry for yourself.

We don't have to have an unbiased review because of [insert logical fallacy].

File: where-the-hell-is-matt-2012.jpg (74KB, 450x300px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 450x300px

>>8100165
You do realize
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stylometry
Is a thing, right?
Like we can detect you samefagging?
You don't because you're a major faggot?
Ok then.

We're mad at stupid people that come on here and have no idea how the Scientific method works.

You don't have any business being on here if you don't accept it 100% and understand it 100%.

This isn't a room for idiots.

G.T.F.O. you faggots.

>>8100201
Yeah, and also,

>>8099742
that no matter where you go, which subculture you consider and around what subject their fanaticism revolves, the very nature of it being a subculture will invariably lead to infights, drama, elitism and absolutely inane discussions about objectively unimportant aspects of their interest.

If you try to coexist with "normals", you end up feeling out of touch.
If you try to coexist with "peers", you end up sucked into a toxic environment that is as self propagating as it is counterproductive.

Basically:
>A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.

>>8100218
>I call this effect the lazy fire.
>because it grabs the closest kindling and ignites it, no matter if the kindling props open the ventilation shaft necessary for the fire to grow.
>the very nature of fire is lazy, which is why we build campfires in specific patterns and after strict rules of fuel size, or spend our nights cold.

>but social groups are not curated as such, rather they are so slow to spread that they do not suffer this problem, or so intense that they do not mind it.

>Revolution Eats its Children.

>>8099742
>hope
My hope is infinite and always will be.
>faith
Why would I have faith in humanity? What has humanity ever done besides bring me to life and maintain an economy that forces guilt down my throat 24/7? What the fuck is the point of being alive if my life directly causes someone else to be worse off? How can I justify owning anything if the very concept of ownership just results in slavery in China? Why the hell would anyone be okay with living in a world structured like this one? What's the fucking point?

No, I never had faith in humanity.

But I can hope.

File: 1457134924986.png (33KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 625x626px

>>8099856

>>8100259
Have some love.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMLqXp4wi9A

>>8100268
Love is a putrid and vile reaction that turns men into self-centered retards. Your feelings do nothing but placate death and destruction by ignoring that such death and destruction occurs for more complex reasons that mere hatred. As if love was the cure for hatred in the first place, which is obviously isn't if you've ever been in a shitty mood.

Sympathize or die, because at least your death can matter. Blasting your own putrid emotions into the air is disruptive, rude, and counterproductive to the things we need to do to get anything done around here.

Your stupidity, in this case, is literally toxic to human affairs.

>>8100273
everyone has some dad abuse issues, but that doesn't mean you have to hide your feelings, level up your Feeling Quotient, worship death, fuck yourself, you deserve it

>>8099842
Old Man and the Lisa

File: CUHtg3rUcAAf8Ve1.jpg (50KB, 600x436px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 600x436px

>>8099837
Not /pol/lack but seriously, kys

File: 1450612054229.jpg (49KB, 400x429px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 400x429px

>>8099742
>ITT: shit that makes you lose hope in humanity


the most obvious is scientific realism; the bigger the lie, the more they believe.

>>8100144
Studies have shown that if people are offered more money if they get a better grade in an IQ test they usually have higher scores

Judaism

Knowing that faith in Science makes less sense than faith in the Bible.
Science is a liar... sometimes.
#AssKickersUnited

>>8099743
fpbp

File: fugga.jpg (357KB, 750x500px) Image search: [Google]

357KB, 750x500px

>>8100134
>gets BTFO on /lit/
>comes to cry here
I'm watching you moafugga

>>8099867

I'll bite.

110-120 range is imperative to science because they are in the golden zone to be able to comprehend the data, solve the problems, and achieve results. At the same time, still (for the most part) engage in normal civilized behaviors. Also, many of the people in this zone can understand the specific details, and have the ability to communicate in a way that those who don't, can still understand it to some degree.

A society of 130+ turboautist virgins would perish after 2 generations.

>>8100171
fucking loved that book. gonna reread it

>>8100843
why would they dissapear when they are the only choice to fuck?

>>8100151
you got it wrong /fit/ makes you gay, seriously just look at the sticker or read ANY thread.

>>8100580
that is because IQ-tests are boring as fuck.
I have only ONCE gotten far enough to go all of it through and use my time up.
Than one time I was really excited to do it and even then it ended boring as fuck it felt like a battle of eons.
But i got through though.

File: 1464103888527.jpg (155KB, 500x492px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 500x492px

>>8099742
>Reddit memes

File: ykqiURa.jpg (47KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 500x375px

>>8100171
Reread the book. He openly admits half of his intelligence was just rusing. He was assuming the safecracker was a genius, when he's just like "most people are too dumb to change the default password". Same when he had to go against the abacus master. He never brought it up in his book I think, but he was a bit Autismo, staying up late and/or waking up early to do integrals instead of fucking his wife.

>>8100891
Pandas don't fuck, and they're not driven to choose by the same social rigors as humans. It's absolutely possible that civilisations die out due to poor selection. It's not THAT important to have a babby.

>>8100843
Despite not having any academic reason to believe you, it sounds reasonable.

The same should be valid for higher-than-human intelligences. It seems there needs to be a "chain" of intelligence levels simplifying matters to the lower rung, if we're to comprehend superhuman brain power.

>>8101203
>kinda like government, amirite

>>8099743
First post best post

>>8099743
Only post in this thread worth looking at

when people are too dumb to know what gender they are

>>8100968
stupid Fredposter

>>8100167
>>8100167
>lol Richard Feynman had an IQ of 125 but is one of the most important modern physicists
yes stay in your crass

>>8099742
Brainlets and people who get their science from facebook.
>Flat earthers
>anti vaxxers
>social media vegans
>third wave feminists

just to name a few
How do you get so regressed in your thinking that middle age peasants had a better grasp on shit than you.

fucking brainlets

>emoji movie

File: Divded_by_zero_6848.jpg (55KB, 350x262px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 350x262px

>>8099837
>think about himself as intellegent
>uninorically believe that pusszle-solving game (IQ test) can accurate measure so-called intelligence even no one know what it actually is

File: 1440849774971.png (8KB, 764x279px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 764x279px

>>8103423
fucking freshmen like you

>>8100149
People that think the working class is unintelligent don't associate with them.

Some of the smartest people I've known never went to college.

This thread is not /sci/.

>>8103850
Not freshman, I graduated last year. Also I'm in Australia so I still haven't even paid for my university degree yet

>>8104844
might want to keep that last bit to yourself, m8

>>8103850
He's not wrong though. There's a lot of places you could get your science from that's just as accessible as Facebook, that's far better. Hell even Wikipedia is better, at least it's relatively unbiased in comparison

>>8103600

Intelligence is well defined. We know exactly what it is and how it is measured because intelligence is by definition what IQ tests measure, and they are designed explicitly for that extremely specific application.

>>8104857
No it's not. The APA did a study on this, even psychologists who are "experts" in intelligence do not agree on any definition

>>8104857
Define intelligence

The only thing we can say that IQ tests measure with any certainty is how good you are at solving IQ tests

>>8104861
this

>>8100037
Anything thats antiwhitemale cis gender; i hate.

We're allowed to discriminate everyone accept for us.

>>8099742
Unnecessary greed.

slavery
rape
racism
murder, war, genocide
weapons of mass destruction
homelessness
acute malnutrition
exploitation
usury

climate change deniers

creationists

young earth theists

anti nuclear power people

people that don't see the value in space flight

people that unironically say they want flying cars and jet packs.

>>8099742
Sounds like a /pol/ thread.
MRAs.
Libertarians.
Trump supporters.
Republicans in general.
Liberals who are against nuclear.
Liberals who say the second amendment doesn't mean what it clearly means.

sage goes in all fields.

The Judicial System
The Psychiatric System
The Foster Care System
The Voting System
Bullying
Fallacies
Doxa
Prejudice
Dishonesty
Intellectual Dishonesty

>>8105478
Name one thing wrong with the Libertarian Party Platform.
Your complaint MUST be in the official party platform or it's just fearmongering ignorance.

>>8105478
You're not a scientist.
Take off that goofy name.
We've proven how you're just an ignorant political extremist.
You make wild claims and shift the burden of proof.
You haven't the slightest clue as to what Science is.
Part of Science is trying to prove hypothesis wrong. You don't do this. It's not part of your thought process and you obviously aren't capable of conceiving it.

File: tripfagtard is tarded.png (7KB, 469x217px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 469x217px

>>8105478
>shit that makes you lose hope in humanity
>Libertarians.
kys

>>8105478
Tripfags like you make me lose hope in humanity.

File: fart-panorama.jpg (161KB, 1750x375px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 1750x375px

>>8105475

Climate change alarmists

People who unironically dont want flying cars and jet packs

Please gas yourself.

>>8104860
>psychologists
>experts on anything
>scientists in any way

nice meme.
social """science""" is not science

>>8104861
Intelligence is pattern recognition

IQ measures pattern recognition capability

>>8105491
Well, for starters...

https://www.lp.org/platform

Against government-paid schools.
> Education is best provided by the free market, achieving greater quality, accountability and efficiency with more diversity of choice.

Pro international free trade agreements.
> We support the removal of governmental impediments to free trade. Political freedom and escape from tyranny demand that individuals not be unreasonably constrained by government in the crossing of political boundaries. Economic freedom demands the unrestricted movement of human as well as financial capital across national borders.

Against the civil rights legislation of 1964, such as the public accommodations act.
> Members of private organizations retain their rights to set whatever standards of association they deem appropriate, and individuals are free to respond with ostracism, boycotts and other free market solutions.

Against Marxist wealth redistribution campaigns.
> All efforts by government to redistribute wealth,

Supports the bullshit "right" of the parent to keep their child ignorant, at the cost of the /right/ of the child to be educated and informed.
> Recognizing that the education of children is a parental responsibility, we would restore authority to parents to determine the education of their children, without interference from government.
> Parents, or other guardians, have the right to raise their children according to their own standards and beliefs.

To be continued...

>>8105514
christ, kid.

move to north korea if you want the state to handle everything.

>>8099995
That just explains how matter is created AFTER the big bang.

>>8105514
> All efforts by government to redistribute wealth,
Yeah it's called meritocracy, giving money to junkies and other degenerates from those who excel isn't a good way to progress.

Ever heard of the Needham question? Why China didn't develop science first. One of the strongest answers is:
>Yingqui Liu and Chunjiang Liu[16] argued that the issue rested on the lack of property rights and that those rights were only obtainable through favour of the emperor. Protection was incomplete as the emperor could rescind those rights at any time. Science and technology were subjugated to the needs of the feudal royal family, and any new discoveries were sequestered by the government for its use. The government took steps to control and interfere with private enterprises by manipulating prices and engaging in bribery. Each revolution in China redistributed property rights under the same feudal system. Land and property were reallocated first and foremost to the royal family of the new dynasty up until the late Qing Dynasty (1644–1911) when fiefdom land was taken over by warlords and merchants. These limited property rights constrained potential scientific innovations.

Your ideology is anti-science.

>>8100085

I have done some brute force password cracking back in the day.

Gotta wonder what the mass of the universe is in monkeys and typewriters and how many characters per minute a monkey will produce at a typewriter.

We should be able to calculate how long on average it would take for a universe filled with monkeys and typewriters to produce a copy.

>>8105505
I'm actually laughing that you saved that, and because you think that I did something wrong. Please, by all means, keeping bringing that up. It just makes me look good to people who are not idiots. I would prefer if you saved the context too, to post that, but I think it mostly stands fine on its own.

>>8105491
>>8105514
https://www.lp.org/platform
But most importantly, the entire bullshit foundation of libertarianism, which can be summed up in two premises, quoted from the above link.

The non-aggression principle:
> The only legitimate use of force is in defense of individual rights — life, liberty, and justly acquired property — against aggression.

Absolute private property rights:
> the right to property -- accordingly we oppose all government interference with private property, such as confiscation, nationalization, and eminent domain,

I am a pragmatic (secular) humanist. I favor whatever plans and policies actually achieve the best society in terms of the aggregate happiness, safety, self determination, material wealth, and other aspects of well-being of the population. In particular, I favor Rawls's Veil Of Ignorance standard for the utilitarian aggregation function.

This kind of free market system is what got us to the Robber Barrons of the late 1800s. With great economic disparity comes great wealth disparity. That's why, at a minimum, I want progressive inheritance taxes with 99%+ tax rates on the filthy rich. I will note that I stand in good company on this, including basically all of the founders of the United States, Adam Smith, Karl Marx, and more.
http://www.economist.com/blogs/lexington/2010/10/estate_tax_and_founding_fathers
We need to use government taxes to end aristocratic lines via inheritance of property.

To be continued.

>>8105491
>>8105514
>>8105532

At a more fundamental level, I am a Marxist. Property is violence. Property is the promise that violence will be inflicted on you by the state if you use some object contrary to the cultural construct of "ownership". I own a car. I do not have a metaphysical connection to that car. What I mean by "I own that car" is that there is a series of cultural constructs which constitute "private property rules". If aliens came to Earth, they would not know that the car is mine, except by examining our particular cultural practices w.r.t. property, property titles, contracts, etc.

A priori, no one has a right to stake out a piece of land, or a piece of property, and promise that they will inflict violence upon anyone who uses the object contrary to their express permission. The "owner" doesn't have any metaphysical connection to it. I utterly reject the labor theory of property as a defense of absolute private property rights.

As I said above, my goals are to make the world into a better place for everyone, ala secular humanism with Rawls's Veil Of Ignorance utilitarianism. I strongly believe based on facts and inferences on those facts that providing absolute protections for private property will not achieve my goals, and is actually counter-productive. I believe that some amounts of government provided services, plus wealth redistribution programs, are necessary to achieve a better world for everyone.

>>8105532
>I'm actually laughing that you saved that, and because you think that I did something wrong.
Jesus fuck you're retarded. Keep doubling down on your retardation.

> The only legitimate use of force is in defense of individual rights — life, liberty, and justly acquired property — against aggression.
Yeah, who are you to apply force against anyone? You sound like an edgy teenager.

>>8105539
>Yeah, who are you to apply force against anyone? You sound like an edgy teenager.

Why yes, yes I would, just like most of Americans who are libertarians.

>>8105536
>Property is violence.
>If aliens came to Earth, they would not know that the car is mine, except by examining our particular cultural practices w.r.t. property, property titles, contracts, etc.
even children understand property as young as 3-4. you're dumber than a child. property is me respecting things you earned. the violence would be me forcefully taking your car from you.

> no one has a right to stake out a piece of land, or a piece of property, and promise that they will inflict violence upon anyone who uses the object contrary to their express permission.
But you're ok with the state doing it. so you're retarded.

>As I said above, my goals are to make the world into a better place for everyone
The road to hell is paved with good intention.

>>8105544
>it's ok when i do it
jesus fuck you're a dumbass.

>>8105547
>even children understand property as young as 3-4. you're dumber than a child. property is me respecting things you earned. the violence would be me forcefully taking your car from you.

Variant of the appeal to nature fallacy. In particular, just because it's instinctual doesn't make it right.

>But you're ok with the state doing it. so you're retarded.
Yes, I am sometimes ok with the government doing that, and I believe that such situations can be safely circumscribed to result in more good than harm.

>>8105548
It's a bit more complicated than that, and you know that. I'm able to honestly represent your position. I hope and ask for the same courtesy.

>>8105532
3 / 0 is not infinity, because 0 * infinity does not equal 3.

If you don't like this, maybe you should change the way that these functions are defined. To actual mathematicians, rigor is important.


But then again, you're a marxist, so rigor doesn't appeal to you. Just "hurr durr it SOUNDS right so it IS right"

>>8105551
>and I believe that such situations can be safely circumscribed to result in more good than harm.
yup
>it's ok when i do it

>It's a bit more complicated than that, and you know that.
nice obfuscation
> I'm able to honestly represent your position. I hope and ask for the same courtesy.
Go fuck yourself you think violence is justifiable to impose your dogmatism. You lost any respect anyone should give you.

>>8105557
In context, and even without context, it's readily apparent that I was taking apart someone else's argument by providing a counter-example in their logic and assumptions to derive a contradiction.

Further, when talking about the extended reals, IIRC, 3 / 0 is not infinity, because
lim as x-> 0 of 3 / x is undefined, because
lim as x -> 0+ of 3 /x is positive infinity, and
lim as x -> 0- of 3 / x is negative infinity.

However, I didn't need to go that far to make my original point.

Still, your petty need to discredit me is amusing, and also pretty silly right now. Anyone can see through it.

>>8105557
3/0 is infinity, 0/0 is undefined.

nice try put your trip back on.

>>8105562
>talks to himself
>this desperate to save face after he wolframed his retardation

>>8105568
lol

>>8105565
>>8105565
3 / 0 is not infinity

the limit of 3 / n as n approaches 0 is infinity, but that doesn't mean 3 / 0 = infinity.

learn to math, my friend.


>>8105562
>tripfag
>is fag

it's like pottery

File: butthurt.jpg (33KB, 600x595px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 600x595px

>>8105570

>>8105572
>the limit of 3 / n as n approaches 0 is infinity,
No it's not. See:
>>8105562

>>8105575
>negative infinity
>positive infinity
>not the same

when will this meme die?

>>8105579
When you change mathematics textbooks and the consensus of mathematicians worldwide.

Good luck.

>>8105583
shut it up, you

Leftism.

Oh wait, I thought we were on /pol/.

File: western civilisation.gif (4MB, 270x263px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 270x263px

>>8105586

No, leftism is pretty much cancer.

>"fuck religion, let's go science!"
>"Glad you could join us! Here's "The Bell Curve", a fine example of IQ disparity between the races due to large amounts of data collected over decades!"
>"OMFG RACIST FASCIST"

File: haters gonna hate.jpg (71KB, 720x554px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 720x554px

>>8105595
Even if it's true - and it's not - why do you care so much? It doesn't matter.

File: 1457767536326.jpg (67KB, 450x685px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 450x685px

>>8105595
>>8105586
Leftism is new age Christinsanity.

>sorry father for I have sinned
>sorry commissar for I have privilege

File: 1457767549220.jpg (63KB, 450x683px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 450x683px

>>8105604
>From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.

File: jesus3.jpg (190KB, 1114x514px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 1114x514px

>>8105604
>>8105607
Even Engels admitted it.

>>8105607
I don't actually believe that. Most "leftists" today do not believe that.

>>8105609
Not what you were saying a moment ago with your redistribution of wealth horseshit.

>>8105615
Again, you need to work on this thing called "intellectual honesty". There are plenty of policy proposals and desired goals that are one but not the other.

I want to keep the wealth gap small in order to prevent dynastic aristocratic concentrations of power. I do not want to reward people according to the asinine metric "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs". Those are two different things.

>>8105622
>Again, you need to work on this thing called "intellectual honesty"
Rich coming from you.

>I want to keep the wealth gap small in order to prevent dynastic aristocratic concentrations of power.
>by giving government the ability to seize peoples belongings
lmao

File: 1434914698954.jpg (48KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 500x500px

>>8105622

Trump and his supporters, honestly. I don't think the guy is capable of rational thought. "There is no drought in California" then within the same few days: "I can fix the drought in California; open the water".
>open the water
nigga what!?!?
And other things like "global warming is a hoax developed by China to make us less competitive", among other things.

That, and people who leech the welfare system.

>>8105637
>>8105637
get ready for 8 years of greatness, friend

>>8099856
lol
Your IQ is composed of fluid and crystallized intelligence

>>8105637
Trump is the best candidate by leaps and bounds. Gaffes happen constantly to those in the public eye.

every single person i knew in high school hated math and had no scientific interests whatsoever

>>8106238
why would they, the smarter you get, the sadder you become. math and physics is for autists im so sorry

Which is more important?
Shampoo or the cure for Alzheimer's?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tSNsOJ4-VwU

Parody aside, human have no priorities.

>>8105514
>Against government-paid schools.
Why should people without kids pay for kids?
Parents can pay for their own kids education.
That's called logic.

>Pro international free trade agreements.
Free trade is bad? What kind of psychopath are you?

>Against the civil rights legislation of 1964, such as the public accommodations act.
They're not against anyone or anything, they're for people have the freedom to chose whom they employ, which is a freedom.
Forcing people to hire people they don't want to hire isn't a freedom,

>Against Marxist wealth redistribution campaigns.
Marxism is complete nonsense and is psychopathic theft by nature.
People that don't work don't deserve money.
That's nature and logic.

>Supports the bullshit "right" of the parent to keep their child ignorant, at the cost of the /right/ of the child to be educated and informed.
See above in regards

>The non-aggression principle:
Only a psychopath would be against the non-aggression principle

>Absolute private property rights
Yes, if you own something it's yours.
Individuality is part of sentience and self awareness, and property rights do hand in hand with that.

>I am a pragmatic (secular) humanist. I favor whatever plans and policies actually achieve the best society in terms of the aggregate happiness, safety, self determination, material wealth, and other aspects of well-being of the population. In particular, I favor Rawls's Veil Of Ignorance standard for the utilitarian aggregation function.

Then you can't be a liberal or marxist, because taking away people's property, freedom and right to choose is the same thing as oppression, forced ignorance, forced slavery and promotes stagnation.

The free market never promoted anything because we've never had a free market.
All markets have been backed by Government contracts; end of story.

You seem to be oblivious that Marxism nonsense has been debunked several times, and there is a very clear reason why no one takes Marxism seriously.

>>8105836
lol
Apples are red with green leaves

>>8100785
>>8101659
>>8102151

>>8100843
what is the point of society if its highest members cannot even participate? Games for the dumbasses and easily led?

>>8107144
>high iq pegs you as a high member

nice projection

>>8099842
The one where Burns recycles the ocean.

>>8106238
I hated math and had no scientific interests and did well in all math and science classes I took
Like science trivia was the most I could bring myself to care about

>>8100225
Beautiful

>>8100259
Those people working factory jobs in Chana have better wages than the remote farming villages they come from. It is how a nation grows.

>>8099742
/pol/

>>8105509
Then who is it that is deciding what intelligence is? Where is the bar set? With so many variables one can't even begin to generalize intelligence.

World Star Hip-hop

>>8105586
>>8105595
>I don't know what Leftism is: the post

>>8105512
But what about novel ideas or motions? There are so many unanswered questions that every time we can figure out the solution to one issue, and effectively communicate it, we're left with even more issues to settle.

There's no end to this. We need all the people and all the ideas we can muster.

>>8099742
Virtue signalers.

muslims

>>8099742
IQ fags

>>8109429
I decide.

/pol/ faggots who treat /sci/ as /pol/ with charts and equations

>>8099742
Liberals
Social science undergraduates
The "working" class (on benefits)

>>8110016
> anything I don't like is /pol/
SJWtard shitposting 101. Go back to your dildo chair carl

>>8099879
there are no shitty jobs, just shitty employees
notshitty employees will do any job so long as you pay them enough

>>8100144
new england m8, no idiots here

>>8110056
Do you have a job or something faggot? Everytime someone mentions /pol/ you show up and start getting massively fucking triggered and defending your safe space.

And yes, I can tell it's you because /sci/ is a slow board and 'SJWtard' is a pretty uncommon insult, but you insist on spamming it everytime someone hurts your feefees.