Where does time go after we perceive it?

>>8084324

Where is the past ?

I think it's always there but we can no longer perceive it.

File: penn-jillette.jpg (35KB, 300x400px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 300x400px

Into the trash

>>8084331
Behind you.

File: 1459082840657.jpg (140KB, 736x509px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 736x509px

>>8084331
>always
I smoke weed too, and I also like the idea of treating time as a spatial dimension.
But you have to be careful about using time-related words to describe things.

OP, time exists whether we perceive it or not, which is handy because otherwise the universe would never have gotten old enough for us to come along.
If we treat time like a spatial dimension we need names for the two "new" directions.
Not up, down, north, south, east or west.
So the words I'm looking for would be "past" and "future".

>>8084324
>after we perceive it

It goes into our memory.

Right angles from every 3D point in a direction you can't point in.

>>8084376
This

>>8084350

We move through time like we move through space. We just move in one direction and we have no controle about it. It's not completely irrelevant.

into entropy. otherwise, it doesn't exist and is equally viable to the present

>>8084383
>We just move in one direction

Our memories record the past as moving in 1 direction and that's all we can observe but that doesn't mean it's true. What if the flow of time oscillates or meanders about randomly.

File: monkey(2).jpg (137KB, 634x876px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 634x876px

The parts that compose an old book don't go anywhere, they just become the present.

>>8084402
Dumb gorillaposter

>>8084383
>We move through time like we move through space.
>. It's not completely irrelevant.
I never said we don't move through it, just that everything does. There's nothing special about our perception.
And while it's fun to think of it it's like a spatial dimension, beware the use of "always", etc.

My mom likes to say that "all time is simultaneous".
Except that "simultaneous" means " at the same time", so if we're treating time like a spatial dimension, "simultaneous" would mean "located at the same point along the t axis".
Which obviously isn't what she means.

File: EDmV2NB.jpg (54KB, 640x635px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 640x635px

>>8084404
>Dumb gorillaposter
I'm pretty sure gorillaposter is a girl.
At least the original, authentic gorillaposter.

Time is a perceptible dimension, but not a physical dimension.

>>8084324
Did you run out of gorilla pictures?

>where does 1 inch go after I measure 3 inches?

Its always been

>>8084399
>. What if the flow of time oscillates
>oscillates
That word means "varies regularly over time".
Sorry, but you already used up the only temporal dimension earlier in the sentence.

File: 4chan.png (54KB, 303x102px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 303x102px

The most practical answer I can give you is 4chan

>>8084324
Where do the numbers go after you stopped counting? Space and time are abstractions without physical existence. They only exist as structural qualities of the information field.

Time doesn't exist. Fuck you.