/sci/ career

>>8049863
>compsci
>10 income
wew lad

>Engineering
>Rigor:8

boy i done did do dop

>>8049891
Stupid question, is it harder or easier?

>>8049863
>consulting is advancing
KEK

>>8049863
>cancerous shitboasting!

>>8049898
Engineering is hard, but it is certainly not rigorous.

>>8049863
>Update
>Engineering:
Luck:2
>Physics:
Luck:1

>Mathematics:
Rigor:10
Sociability:1
Bullshit Endurance:0
Job Security:0
Income:0
Versatility:0
Knowledgeability:10
Prestige:11
Luck:8
Any job ever with a substantial sum of dosh

>>8049863
> physics
> Rigor: 10

Pick one, pal

Starting classes
>Gender Studies:
Rigor:0
Sociability:8
Bullshit Endurance:10
Job Security:0
Income:0
Versatility:2
Knowledgeability:0
Prestige:0
Luck:10
May end up as top burger flipper at a famous american franchise company

>>8049885
unemployed math/physics fag spotted

>>8049863
>Job Security:10
Fucking kek.

>>8050085
>implying you don't have to be a faggot or working at the most obscure engineering form.
Of course this doesn't apply for shit like Nuke Engy/Geo Engy where there are only three jobs

>>8049863
this list is awful

>>8050046
would this include Mc Donalds?

>>8049863
>Medicine
Rigor:0
Sociability:10
Bullshit Endurance:0
Job Security:10
Income:40
Versatility:0
Knowledgeability:0
Prestige: 20
Luck:0

>>8050196
Have a guess.

>Math
Autism: 11
Rigor: Nigga it's math
Job Security: -2

physics
Rigor: lel were in the 7th dimension tho :^)
Job security: I can always work at Starbucks
Insecurity: hey don't make fun of science :^(

>>8050215
All of my friends were going into the medical field.
Keep kidding yourself

>>8049863
>>Physics:
>Rigor:10
>Sociability:3
>Bullshit Endurance:8
>Job Security:6
>Income:5
>Versatility:8
>Knowledgeability:10
>Prestige:10
>Luck:8
>May end in suicide, Michio Kaku if lucky, or rarely form a new and practical idea

Physicist with PhD here. Your parameters are way off.

Job Security: 10 (We are trying to recruit people but it is hard to find people. Laws of nature is the same all over the globe so you can het a job many places. I did a couple of years in Japan.)

Income: 9 (Salary in research is dire of course but your career can change a lot. After academic research I did a fellowship (not too bad pay), electronics designer (rather good), programming (well paid but that involved insane amounts of overtime) and now consultant (partner status))

Versatility: 10 (or 11 even. I have moved effortlessly between physics, electronics, software and IPR.)

(I think I'll do an AMA this weekend)

>>8050260
>going into

>>8050661
We're talking bachelor's pham. A PhD in comp sci or engineering could fare just as well as you did perhaps better.

You're only one-upping math PhDs here.

>>8050822

>You're only one-upping pure math PhDs here.

ftfy

applied math shit on physics

File: time_to_be_serious.jpg (180KB, 580x542px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 580x542px

>>8049863
>Engineering:

>Rigor:8
>Prestige:9
Knowledgeability:8
>Versatility:5

>Physics:

>Rigor:10
>Prestige:10
>Knowledgeability:10
>Versatility:8

OP is a physics major. This isn't unbiased and therefore not worth taking seriously.

/thread

>>8049863
>CompSci

>Rigor: 4

Only for codeniggers, a serious CS major need to take it to 10. Unfortunelly the majority is just braindead codeniggers, that's why you see stupid undergrad errors on big names of the industry.

Some code bugs can kill a lot of people. http://royal.pingdom.com/2009/03/19/10-historical-software-bugs-with-extreme-consequences/

>>8050822
If we're talking bachelors you shouldn't consider anything besides CS, Engineering, and some sort of applied math that gets you into finance.

All other stem degrees require a PhD to get you to the ideal. That includes physics for the most part.

>>8049945
well meme'd

>>8050196
no, you'd be overqualified.

More of a mom n pops burger joint tbqhwy