/sci/, what is some good math or chemistry related lectures to

I like the MIT ocw lectures for single variable calculus. I heard that some like the buff dude for calculus(idk the name of the youtube channel). Unaware of any chemistry lectures that are good. Also, tbqh would recommend learning from a textbook rather than from a person.

>>8038151
Learn from a book rather than a video. You will take in half as much sitting and watching rather than reading, and there's much more space in a book to explain the subtleties.

>>8038183
This, and if you read something several times and don't understand, then you can look into other sources for that topic like videos

>>8038173
Its Professor Leonard. He's pretty good for basic calculus. However, I agrew with what >>8038183 said. Books adjust to your pace and videos dont.

>>8038189
>>8038193

The book we were given is Stewart's, which is honestly kind of weird to read. I read it for studying and then do the problem sets, but I feel like I would have a tough time learning from that book alone with I didn't have the lecture.

I tried Spivak's but I feel like I don't have the mathematical maturity for it. What else is there?

>>8038201
Apostol and Spivak are the two most popular ones for self-study. I've had a room mate who has read Elementary Calculus by Kiesler (https://www.math.wisc.edu/~keisler/calc.html) but never read it myself. I would recommend Calculus by Morris Kline. It gives quite a few application-based problems and makes it easier to digest for some. Also as a chemistry major I feel partial toward Chang and Brown. I read them together and it gives a thorough understanding of general chemistry. I read and took notes on Chang and did the exercises for it first then went to Brown as the style of questions in Brown is a little different

>>8038193
>videos don't adjust to your pace
what is the pause button
what is the rewind button

>>8038241
Don't be facetious.

>>8038241
Wow, people this stupid generally don't kbow how to type. I guess you're a different type of stupid, maybe a special kind?

>>8038151
That's a cute lecturer, would bang.

/sci/ this is somewhat unrelated but how do I find out what period a particular transition metal belongs to?

>>8038201
Tbh, Spivak's non-calculus related sections are typically the hardest for beginners (which are the first two chapters). If you're having a hard time then pick up a book for helping you with proofs.

>>8038945
Any recommendations on proofs?

>>8039375
Hammack Book of Proof is typically recommended as its free in PDF form