Is it possible?

>>7985990

That's fucking gay.

Why do people spend time thinking these stupid hypothetical things up?

>>7985990

If your image is suggesting our memories. beliefs are false, then so are all our memories of thermodynamic experiments about entropy leading to your theory.

So the pic disproves itself

>>7985990
I don't get it

>>7986336
Nice.
It feels good to be alive.

>>7985990
Entropy, like everything else, is relative. For instance, protein folding occurs spontaneously (which seems to remove entropy from the system), but the surrounding water molecules gain entropy through increased degrees of freedom that they didn't have surrounding the unfolded protein. Just because we form in some part of the Universe which leads to a decreased entropy in one reference frame doesn't mean that the total entropy of the system doesn't increase with time.

>>7986336

It doesn't disprove it. Give one hypothetical universe where the 2nd law of thermodynamics doesn't exist.

>>7986371
Ours at the small scale?

>>7985990
This assumes brains and all the events that led up to us are entropically unfavorable. Clearly it's not.

>>7985990
Here's the flaw: that graph is meaningless. What the fuck is a fluctuation? Net entropy increases monotomically no matter what. Sure, life is low entropy and brains are even lower entropy, but the net entropy of the universe keeps going up or stays the same as time moves forward.

>>7986385
2nd law only applies to closed isolated systems.

>>7986501
>implying

>>7985990
If we were Boltzmann brains, it would be very unlikely for us to have those false memories of living in a low entropy universe. We would expect to have memories that seem random.